Corante

About this Author
DBL%20Hendrix%20small.png College chemistry, 1983

Derek Lowe The 2002 Model

Dbl%20new%20portrait%20B%26W.png After 10 years of blogging. . .

Derek Lowe, an Arkansan by birth, got his BA from Hendrix College and his PhD in organic chemistry from Duke before spending time in Germany on a Humboldt Fellowship on his post-doc. He's worked for several major pharmaceutical companies since 1989 on drug discovery projects against schizophrenia, Alzheimer's, diabetes, osteoporosis and other diseases. To contact Derek email him directly: derekb.lowe@gmail.com Twitter: Dereklowe

Chemistry and Drug Data: Drugbank
Emolecules
ChemSpider
Chempedia Lab
Synthetic Pages
Organic Chemistry Portal
PubChem
Not Voodoo
DailyMed
Druglib
Clinicaltrials.gov

Chemistry and Pharma Blogs:
Org Prep Daily
The Haystack
Kilomentor
A New Merck, Reviewed
Liberal Arts Chemistry
Electron Pusher
All Things Metathesis
C&E News Blogs
Chemiotics II
Chemical Space
Noel O'Blog
In Vivo Blog
Terra Sigilatta
BBSRC/Douglas Kell
ChemBark
Realizations in Biostatistics
Chemjobber
Pharmalot
ChemSpider Blog
Pharmagossip
Med-Chemist
Organic Chem - Education & Industry
Pharma Strategy Blog
No Name No Slogan
Practical Fragments
SimBioSys
The Curious Wavefunction
Natural Product Man
Fragment Literature
Chemistry World Blog
Synthetic Nature
Chemistry Blog
Synthesizing Ideas
Business|Bytes|Genes|Molecules
Eye on FDA
Chemical Forums
Depth-First
Symyx Blog
Sceptical Chymist
Lamentations on Chemistry
Computational Organic Chemistry
Mining Drugs
Henry Rzepa


Science Blogs and News:
Bad Science
The Loom
Uncertain Principles
Fierce Biotech
Blogs for Industry
Omics! Omics!
Young Female Scientist
Notional Slurry
Nobel Intent
SciTech Daily
Science Blog
FuturePundit
Aetiology
Gene Expression (I)
Gene Expression (II)
Sciencebase
Pharyngula
Adventures in Ethics and Science
Transterrestrial Musings
Slashdot Science
Cosmic Variance
Biology News Net


Medical Blogs
DB's Medical Rants
Science-Based Medicine
GruntDoc
Respectful Insolence
Diabetes Mine


Economics and Business
Marginal Revolution
The Volokh Conspiracy
Knowledge Problem


Politics / Current Events
Virginia Postrel
Instapundit
Belmont Club
Mickey Kaus


Belles Lettres
Uncouth Reflections
Arts and Letters Daily
In the Pipeline: Don't miss Derek Lowe's excellent commentary on drug discovery and the pharma industry in general at In the Pipeline

In the Pipeline

« The Overselling of Ionic Liquids | Main | Product Inhibition, Or Grinding To A Halt »

June 12, 2013

Influential Chemists, Anyone?

Email This Entry

Posted by Derek

ChemBark has an interesting question here: who's the most respected and influential chemist, among chemists? He was taking nominations on Twitter, and has settled on Roald Hoffman as his choice. Other strong contenders included Nocera, Corey, Whitesides, Sharpless, Kroto, Grubbs, Gray, Hershbach, Zare, and Stoddart. Anyone over here have names to add to the list? Note again that we're talking influence and fame inside the field, because if you go to "among the general public", you pretty much cut everyone out right there, unfortunately. . .

Comments (70) + TrackBacks (0) | Category: Chemical News


COMMENTS

1. Jose on June 12, 2013 7:31 AM writes...

Everyone sure as hell should thank Carl Djerassi!!

Permalink to Comment

2. Justin on June 12, 2013 8:03 AM writes...

I'm not sure the question to be "an interesting question".

Permalink to Comment

3. Anonymous on June 12, 2013 8:32 AM writes...

Albert Hofmann? Alexander Shulgin?

Permalink to Comment

4. matt on June 12, 2013 8:45 AM writes...

Krzysztof Matyjaszewski

Permalink to Comment

5. K C Nicolau on June 12, 2013 8:48 AM writes...

K C Nicolau

Permalink to Comment

6. Dan on June 12, 2013 8:49 AM writes...

Abby Doyle

Permalink to Comment

7. Puff the Mutant Dragon on June 12, 2013 9:26 AM writes...

I second Alexander Shulgin (that's Sasha to you)

Permalink to Comment

8. Don on June 12, 2013 9:34 AM writes...

KC Nicolaou

Permalink to Comment

9. anon the II on June 12, 2013 9:47 AM writes...

No question:

Clark Still

Permalink to Comment

10. Anonymous on June 12, 2013 10:07 AM writes...

p andrew evans

Permalink to Comment

11. Former Princeton Postdoc on June 12, 2013 10:17 AM writes...

Abby Doyle. no Doubt.

Permalink to Comment

12. NU chemist on June 12, 2013 10:32 AM writes...

just gave my PhD qualifying exam with Stoddart on my committee! it was a real pleasure, great scientist and great guy too

Permalink to Comment

13. jibjabjobber on June 12, 2013 10:33 AM writes...

The folks who came up with the 'blogsyn' concept, lasting all of three months it did...

Permalink to Comment

14. anon on June 12, 2013 10:55 AM writes...

I knew it was a witch hunt. it is easy to throw stones at others (particularly, when one is a hack in chemical synthesis).

Permalink to Comment

15. anaon2 on June 12, 2013 10:57 AM writes...

blog-syn and cro were out to sully the hard earned reputation of others.

Permalink to Comment

16. bad wolf on June 12, 2013 11:08 AM writes...

The only thing that proves is that daily blogging is not as easy as it looks. (Thanks again Derek!)

If it was a witch hunt maybe you should add Dr. Frontier's Not Voodoo to the suspect list, since that has a "may require mojo" (not reproducible) page as well. Must be a conspiracy that people can't get reported reactions to work! Everyone knows the literature is perfect.

Or, maybe we could use the internet to show hot to make the results reported... like blogsyn.

Permalink to Comment

17. JRnonchemist on June 12, 2013 11:08 AM writes...

If outside chemistry is included, how about Edward Elmer Smith, who founded the genre of Space Opera?

Permalink to Comment

18. Hap on June 12, 2013 11:14 AM writes...

@anaon2: Yes, publishing lots of not-reproducible research to get an undeserved reputation is hard work.

Perhaps we shouldn't be so hard on Curi or Zhang - it's hard work rearranging all those gels with Photoshop. We should perhaps even appreciate cut-and-paste jobs in journals and elsewhere - those masters of the CTRL key are geniuses, and only now can we fully understand their art and gifts. Bravo!

Permalink to Comment

19. a. nonymaus on June 12, 2013 11:41 AM writes...

All y'all that use NMR (especially 13C or 15N), give some respect to the longest-working man in chemistry: John Roberts.

Permalink to Comment

20. cynical1 on June 12, 2013 11:46 AM writes...

Well, when it comes right down to it, probably Alfred Bader influenced more of us than any of us would like to admit. How many of you would have bothered going into organic/medicinal chemistry if you had to make all of those nasty reagents that you use(d) every day? And, once upon a time, Aldrich was really the only game in town. Of course, I'm dating myself.

Permalink to Comment

21. Jeb Bush on June 12, 2013 11:56 AM writes...

The consummate professional Barry Trost

Permalink to Comment

22. Cato the Elder on June 12, 2013 12:18 PM writes...

Derek Barton.

Permalink to Comment

23. Anonymous on June 12, 2013 12:24 PM writes...

Walter White

Permalink to Comment

24. patentgeek on June 12, 2013 12:39 PM writes...

Posthumous honorable mention: Augustus Stanely Owsley.

Permalink to Comment

25. RB Woodweird on June 12, 2013 12:54 PM writes...

Hell, I've been dead for three decades and I'm still the best chemist on this planet.

Permalink to Comment

26. Sam Weller on June 12, 2013 1:01 PM writes...

Angela Merkel

Permalink to Comment

27. Cytirps on June 12, 2013 1:21 PM writes...

If one looks at science, mentorship and educating young chemists, Gilbert Stork should be in the top 5. Although he has not been in the limelight for a while, he is definitely a living icon.

Permalink to Comment

28. CMCguy on June 12, 2013 1:42 PM writes...

Abby Sciuto from NCIS would be my answer for the general public persepctive

Permalink to Comment

29. JC on June 12, 2013 2:20 PM writes...

Dave Nichols

Permalink to Comment

30. Canageek on June 12, 2013 2:43 PM writes...

No love for Richard R. Schrock?

Permalink to Comment

31. Anonymous on June 12, 2013 2:56 PM writes...

Heeger and/or Kohn...

Permalink to Comment

32. JRnonchemist on June 12, 2013 3:09 PM writes...

How about Margaret Thatcher?

Permalink to Comment

33. newnickname on June 12, 2013 3:11 PM writes...

@26, Angela Merkel: If you're going there, better include Margaret Thatcher.

Permalink to Comment

34. Anonymous on June 12, 2013 3:32 PM writes...

@23 Yeah, Mr. White gets my vote.

Permalink to Comment

35. Jz on June 12, 2013 3:50 PM writes...

My vote goes to James J. La Clair of Hexacyclinol fame.

Permalink to Comment

36. Anonymous on June 12, 2013 3:58 PM writes...

who cares

Permalink to Comment

37. McChemist on June 12, 2013 4:19 PM writes...

26, 32/33:

Hey, if we want to go down that road, let's go with Pope Francis.

Permalink to Comment

38. Anonymous on June 12, 2013 5:17 PM writes...

Linus Pauling

Permalink to Comment

39. Anonymous on June 12, 2013 5:19 PM writes...

@10 only one person in the world would think that. Hope you're doing well Andy.

Permalink to Comment

40. Anders Poulsen on June 12, 2013 7:21 PM writes...

To any liberitan or conservative late Iron Lady must be on top of the list.

Permalink to Comment

41. ed on June 12, 2013 7:38 PM writes...

As somebody outside the field, I'd probably say Harold Urey.

Permalink to Comment

42. TX raven on June 12, 2013 7:42 PM writes...

Derek Barton.
John Topliss.

Permalink to Comment

43. Anonymous on June 12, 2013 8:12 PM writes...

Derek Lowe.

Permalink to Comment

44. samadamsthedog on June 12, 2013 9:39 PM writes...

The Chembark article specifies *living* chemists. Or else, who could resist Lavoisier? (Well, apparently everyone else posting to this thread.)

@9, Thanks for nominating Clark. :-)

Some of the Chembark nominees are laughable. Which those are will be left as an exercise for the reader.

Permalink to Comment

45. Mr Gladstone on June 12, 2013 9:45 PM writes...

The Pope

Permalink to Comment

46. Anonymous on June 12, 2013 10:13 PM writes...

Not an interesting question at well...
No clear cut answer either.

Permalink to Comment

47. Anonymous on June 12, 2013 10:17 PM writes...

@ Mr Gladstone, The Pope

Great pick!

Permalink to Comment

48. Anonymous on June 12, 2013 10:45 PM writes...

Frances Arnold

Permalink to Comment

49. Jeff of the North on June 13, 2013 7:48 AM writes...

Knute Rockne

Permalink to Comment

50. The Iron Chemist on June 13, 2013 7:53 AM writes...

The Joker

Permalink to Comment

51. Nigel on June 13, 2013 10:08 AM writes...

Harry Kroto.
(I qualify as "among the general public", & influential or not, he's the only one whose name I recognise without resort to Wikipedia.)

Permalink to Comment

52. anon 8 on June 13, 2013 11:15 AM writes...

It has to be Dr. Arthur Patchett, period. This guy was instrumental in discovering Zocor and Enalapril for Merck who got enriched for two decades plus (a cumulative total of grater than 50 billion dollars). He also enriched many (deserved or undeserved) along the way. Truly, a giant!

Permalink to Comment

53. Sin Nombre on June 13, 2013 1:18 PM writes...

Rich dudes who made useful things and then gave back:

Marvin Caruthers (CU): cofounder of Amgen and ABI, inventor of practical oligonucleotide synthesis and all that has brought

Rick Silverman (NU): inventor of Lyrica, textbook writer, cares about education

Each used their wealth to give a research facility to their home institutions (where each has taught for 3+ decades). Is there anything more influential than literally building a place to train the next generation of chemists?

Permalink to Comment

54. Andy evans on June 13, 2013 1:55 PM writes...

@39 thanks, I like to see the world.....

Permalink to Comment

55. Vincent on June 13, 2013 2:10 PM writes...

Does they have do be from the 20th century ? If not, Lavoisier and Dalton were extremely influencial in creating modern chemistry, and set up the very base of our discipline.
However, as far as influence and fame goes, I'd nominate Mendeleiev. His work is in all and every office!

Permalink to Comment

56. DannoH on June 13, 2013 2:31 PM writes...

How about Glenn Seaborg? I would say that the downstream development of his work has had at least a small influence on the world as we know it.

Permalink to Comment

57. Big Fish on June 13, 2013 3:24 PM writes...

Even with the space dinosaur fiasco, I would say Ron Breslow should be on the list.

Permalink to Comment

58. TfOH on June 13, 2013 4:04 PM writes...

George Olah

Permalink to Comment

59. Big Fish on June 13, 2013 7:10 PM writes...

Y T Lee

Permalink to Comment

60. Secondaire on June 13, 2013 9:05 PM writes...

#53 - I second Rick Silverman. He's a phenomenal human being.

Permalink to Comment

61. Texascarbon on June 13, 2013 11:24 PM writes...

Amazed it took me til 43 to find Derek Lowe. Saw a lot of familiar names, but when you combine respect and influence... Real influence... I'd say good ol DL has brought up a formidable grass roots following over the last decade in a then unconventional way.
I second the DL vote.

Permalink to Comment

62. Model on June 14, 2013 1:37 AM writes...

#61 might be onto something. I open this site first thing in the morning (followed quickly by Org Lett).

Permalink to Comment

63. Gary on June 14, 2013 10:20 PM writes...

Sam Danishefsky and David Evans. Equally crazy, equally briliant thinkers.

Permalink to Comment

64. Anonymous on June 15, 2013 12:04 PM writes...

For synthetic chemists, the most influential people are the editors of highly ranked journals, such as JACS. They decide which paper gets into the journal by selecting the "appropriate" reviewers. They also decide if the manuscript is even reviewed. More JACS = more grant money. It's just the reality.

Evans and Danishefsky used to be the power brokers in the synthetic community, placing their people at top jobs through their influence and strong personalities. I believe they have been replaced with Jacobsen and MacMillan.

Permalink to Comment

65. Dubz on June 16, 2013 12:36 AM writes...

Jean-Pierre Sauvage? Stoddart and co's whole field of work is only possible because of his discoveries (and he's not such a horrific self-publicist as Stoddart!).

Permalink to Comment

66. Chad Jones on June 16, 2013 10:36 PM writes...

Jack Beauchamp. In my field you either came from the Beauchamp lab or were trained by someone that did.

Permalink to Comment

67. doc on June 17, 2013 6:59 PM writes...

Since we're being inclusive...

Sir James Black. Multiple new classes of drugs (beta blockers, acid secretion inhibitors...). Leo Sternbach (Valium). Paul A J Janssen (antifungals, haloperidol, fentanyl...) Corwin Hansch. Harry Day (stannous fluoride for tooth decay). Roger Adams. Louis Fieser.

Aw, the hell with it: Everyone who has a prep in Org Syn, V1- present. 'Nuff said.

Permalink to Comment

68. jon on June 19, 2013 8:06 AM writes...

William Pirkle - the entire field of chiral separations is a derivative of his early work.

Permalink to Comment

69. vetori on June 19, 2013 2:25 PM writes...

Abigail Doyle

Permalink to Comment

70. CK on June 21, 2013 5:40 PM writes...

Dave Nichols

Permalink to Comment

POST A COMMENT




Remember Me?



EMAIL THIS ENTRY TO A FRIEND

Email this entry to:

Your email address:

Message (optional):




RELATED ENTRIES
The Worst Seminar
Conference in Basel
Messed-Up Clinical Studies: A First-Hand Report
Pharma and Ebola
Lilly Steps In for AstraZeneca's Secretase Inhibitor
Update on Alnylam (And the Direction of Things to Come)
There Must Have Been Multiple Chances to Catch This
Weirdly, Tramadol Is Not a Natural Product After All