« An Interview |
| Natural Product Fragments: Get Rid of the Ugly Ones Now »
February 26, 2013
Phil Baran at Blog Syn
I linked recently to the latest reaction check at Blog Syn, benzylic oxidation by IBX. Now Prof. Baran (a co-author on the original paper, from his Nicoloau days) has written See Arr Oh with a detailed repeat of the experiment. He gets it to work, so I think it's fair to say that (1) the reaction is doable, but (2) it's not as easy to reproduce right out of the box as it might be.
I'd like to congratulate him for responding like this. The whole idea of publicly rechecking literature reactions is still fairly new, and (as the comments here have shown), there's a wide range of opinion on it. Getting a detailed, prompt, and civil response from the Baran lab is the best outcome, I think. After all, the point of a published procedure - the point of science - is reproducibility. The IBX reaction is now better known than it was, the details that could make it hard to run are now there for people who want to try it, and Prof. Baran's already high reputation as a scientist actually goes up a bit among the people who've been following this story.
Public reproducibility is an idea whose time, I think, has come, and Blog Syn is only one part of it. When you think about the increasingly well-known problems with reproducing big new biological discoveries, things that could lead to tens and hundreds of millions being spent on clinical research, reproducing organic chemistry reactions shouldn't be controversial at all. As they say to novelists, if you're afraid of bad reviews, there's only one solution: don't show anyone your book.
+ TrackBacks (0) | Category: Chemical News | The Scientific Literature
POST A COMMENT
- RELATED ENTRIES
- Recipe Blogging: Bean Soup With Country Ham, and Cornbread
- Autism and Glyphosate:
- Ibuprofen For a Longer Life?
- Holiday Blogging: Gingersnaps
- Holiday Blogging 2014
- AbbVie Competes on Price
- Merck, Cubist, and Hospira: The Inside
- Another Alzheimer's Antibody Goes Down