About this Author
DBL%20Hendrix%20small.png College chemistry, 1983

Derek Lowe The 2002 Model

Dbl%20new%20portrait%20B%26W.png After 10 years of blogging. . .

Derek Lowe, an Arkansan by birth, got his BA from Hendrix College and his PhD in organic chemistry from Duke before spending time in Germany on a Humboldt Fellowship on his post-doc. He's worked for several major pharmaceutical companies since 1989 on drug discovery projects against schizophrenia, Alzheimer's, diabetes, osteoporosis and other diseases. To contact Derek email him directly: Twitter: Dereklowe

Chemistry and Drug Data: Drugbank
Chempedia Lab
Synthetic Pages
Organic Chemistry Portal
Not Voodoo

Chemistry and Pharma Blogs:
Org Prep Daily
The Haystack
A New Merck, Reviewed
Liberal Arts Chemistry
Electron Pusher
All Things Metathesis
C&E News Blogs
Chemiotics II
Chemical Space
Noel O'Blog
In Vivo Blog
Terra Sigilatta
BBSRC/Douglas Kell
Realizations in Biostatistics
ChemSpider Blog
Organic Chem - Education & Industry
Pharma Strategy Blog
No Name No Slogan
Practical Fragments
The Curious Wavefunction
Natural Product Man
Fragment Literature
Chemistry World Blog
Synthetic Nature
Chemistry Blog
Synthesizing Ideas
Eye on FDA
Chemical Forums
Symyx Blog
Sceptical Chymist
Lamentations on Chemistry
Computational Organic Chemistry
Mining Drugs
Henry Rzepa

Science Blogs and News:
Bad Science
The Loom
Uncertain Principles
Fierce Biotech
Blogs for Industry
Omics! Omics!
Young Female Scientist
Notional Slurry
Nobel Intent
SciTech Daily
Science Blog
Gene Expression (I)
Gene Expression (II)
Adventures in Ethics and Science
Transterrestrial Musings
Slashdot Science
Cosmic Variance
Biology News Net

Medical Blogs
DB's Medical Rants
Science-Based Medicine
Respectful Insolence
Diabetes Mine

Economics and Business
Marginal Revolution
The Volokh Conspiracy
Knowledge Problem

Politics / Current Events
Virginia Postrel
Belmont Club
Mickey Kaus

Belles Lettres
Uncouth Reflections
Arts and Letters Daily
In the Pipeline: Don't miss Derek Lowe's excellent commentary on drug discovery and the pharma industry in general at In the Pipeline

In the Pipeline

« EMBL Chemical Biology: Greasy Labels | Main | EMBL Chemical Biology: Substrate Activity Screening »

September 27, 2012

EMBL Chemical Biology: George Whitesides on Ligand Binding

Email This Entry

Posted by Derek

Now the conference day is winding up with a big talk by George Whitesides. He's talking about his thoughts on enzyme function, with reference to his group's work using carbonic anhydrase as a model. He praises its stability ("a ceramic brick") and other characteristics, as you might expect from someone who's published an entire review on its use in biophysical studies.

So what makes compounds bind to enzyme sites? His take on the hydrophobic effect is that he thinks it's due as much (or more) to changes in networks of water molecules, rather than just the release of structured water at the protein-ligand contact. The latter is important, for sure, but not the whole story. "There is no one hydrophobic effect", he says, "there are many hydrophobic effects".

Another quote: "There ain't nothin' like water", and I definitely agree. We're used to water, since it's the most common chemical substance that we deal with in our lives, but water is weird.

And there's a lot we don't know about it still. For example, Whitesides has just pointed out that we have a reasonable understanding of surface tension in the bulk phase - but not at all for molecular-sized holes. This is crucial for understanding ligand behavior. His view of protein-ligand binding, he says, is very water-centric. . .

Comments (9) + TrackBacks (0) | Category: Chemical Biology


1. barry on September 27, 2012 2:29 PM writes...

prof. William von Eggers Doering recounted his excitement when as a young professor he got to go to Europe and meet with Lars Onsager. At last, he thought, he would understand solvent effects. So they met, and they talked and they talked. And he came back to the U.S., and spent the rest of his long career working in the gas-phase.
Maybe in the 21st century, George finally has the tools to understand solvent effects in depth. Certainly anyone who has tried to evaluate the binding strength for a novel ligand in-silico has encountered the strong (overwhelming!) dependence on how one models water.

Permalink to Comment

2. eugene on September 27, 2012 3:29 PM writes...

Now why couldn't Whitesides give that lecture when he was a plenary speaker here, since it sounds interesting, instead of the crap that was 50 minutes of his view on the nature of research and had most of the audience leave or fall asleep. I think we got robbed.

Permalink to Comment

3. Anonymous on September 27, 2012 3:45 PM writes...

Everytime I shake a bottle of oil and water, I am treated to a front row seat for observing the hydrophobic effect in action. The forces in play here must really be profound because within about ten seconds my dispersion has separated back into two phases. I visualize my drug molecules as super micro oil droplets that really want out of that water and nicely nestled into a snug greasy pocket on a biotarget, assuming I can actually separate my little grease balls from each other in the first place.

Permalink to Comment

4. luysii on September 27, 2012 4:23 PM writes...

From Voet "Biochemistry" 3rd Ed. p. 39

"Water is so familiar, we generally consider it to be a rather bland fluid of simple character. It is, however, a chemically reactive liquid with such extraordinary physical properties that, if chemists had discovered it in recent times, it would have undoubtedly been classified as an exotic substance."

Permalink to Comment

5. Fred on September 27, 2012 5:27 PM writes...

Once again the mystery of water returns to the pipeline and Luysii is there with an awesome insight or link. My question. How come very few academics study water? How do we think we can understand life (biomechanisms) without really understanding water? what i have found is the people that study water are out of the mainstream and have a hard time finding funding. I would love to hear med chemist comments (coughderekcough) on Dr Gerald Pollack work at UW and how it relates to drug discovery and our understanding of cells and life in general.

Permalink to Comment

6. The Rock on September 27, 2012 5:40 PM writes...

Off topic, but certainly outrageous considering this blog's interest in the ongoing sirtuin debacle.

Congratulations Gizem...

Permalink to Comment

7. MJ on September 27, 2012 7:27 PM writes...

Fred - Have you seen Philip Ball's excellent blog on that very topic? You can find it at He doesn't update as often as he did at the start of the blog, but he's still been updating about once every other month over the last year and change. Not sure if I'd agree with your characterization of the field as not mainstream, though - there are plenty of "mainstream" research groups interested in this very topic, although perhaps this is a matter of perspective.

Permalink to Comment

8. Curious Wavefunction on September 27, 2012 9:43 PM writes...

#5: How come very few academics study water?

Actually many of them do. The writer Philip Ball has a whole blog devoted to academic studies on water. Google "Water in Biology" and you will find it.

Permalink to Comment

9. a. nonymaus on September 28, 2012 12:20 PM writes...

#5: How come very few academics study water?

Another (more general) example is the work by John D. Roberts at Caltech on competition between intramolecular and solvent-solute hydrogen bonding in water and other solvents.

Permalink to Comment


Remember Me?


Email this entry to:

Your email address:

Message (optional):

The Last Post
The GSK Layoffs Continue, By Proxy
The Move is Nigh
Another Alzheimer's IPO
Cutbacks at C&E News
Sanofi Pays to Get Back Into Oncology
An Irresponsible Statement About Curing Cancer
Oliver Sacks on Turning Back to Chemistry