Corante

About this Author
DBL%20Hendrix%20small.png College chemistry, 1983

Derek Lowe The 2002 Model

Dbl%20new%20portrait%20B%26W.png After 10 years of blogging. . .

Derek Lowe, an Arkansan by birth, got his BA from Hendrix College and his PhD in organic chemistry from Duke before spending time in Germany on a Humboldt Fellowship on his post-doc. He's worked for several major pharmaceutical companies since 1989 on drug discovery projects against schizophrenia, Alzheimer's, diabetes, osteoporosis and other diseases. To contact Derek email him directly: derekb.lowe@gmail.com Twitter: Dereklowe

Chemistry and Drug Data: Drugbank
Emolecules
ChemSpider
Chempedia Lab
Synthetic Pages
Organic Chemistry Portal
PubChem
Not Voodoo
DailyMed
Druglib
Clinicaltrials.gov

Chemistry and Pharma Blogs:
Org Prep Daily
The Haystack
Kilomentor
A New Merck, Reviewed
Liberal Arts Chemistry
Electron Pusher
All Things Metathesis
C&E News Blogs
Chemiotics II
Chemical Space
Noel O'Blog
In Vivo Blog
Terra Sigilatta
BBSRC/Douglas Kell
ChemBark
Realizations in Biostatistics
Chemjobber
Pharmalot
ChemSpider Blog
Pharmagossip
Med-Chemist
Organic Chem - Education & Industry
Pharma Strategy Blog
No Name No Slogan
Practical Fragments
SimBioSys
The Curious Wavefunction
Natural Product Man
Fragment Literature
Chemistry World Blog
Synthetic Nature
Chemistry Blog
Synthesizing Ideas
Business|Bytes|Genes|Molecules
Eye on FDA
Chemical Forums
Depth-First
Symyx Blog
Sceptical Chymist
Lamentations on Chemistry
Computational Organic Chemistry
Mining Drugs
Henry Rzepa


Science Blogs and News:
Bad Science
The Loom
Uncertain Principles
Fierce Biotech
Blogs for Industry
Omics! Omics!
Young Female Scientist
Notional Slurry
Nobel Intent
SciTech Daily
Science Blog
FuturePundit
Aetiology
Gene Expression (I)
Gene Expression (II)
Sciencebase
Pharyngula
Adventures in Ethics and Science
Transterrestrial Musings
Slashdot Science
Cosmic Variance
Biology News Net


Medical Blogs
DB's Medical Rants
Science-Based Medicine
GruntDoc
Respectful Insolence
Diabetes Mine


Economics and Business
Marginal Revolution
The Volokh Conspiracy
Knowledge Problem


Politics / Current Events
Virginia Postrel
Instapundit
Belmont Club
Mickey Kaus


Belles Lettres
Uncouth Reflections
Arts and Letters Daily
In the Pipeline: Don't miss Derek Lowe's excellent commentary on drug discovery and the pharma industry in general at In the Pipeline

In the Pipeline

« They Don't Make These Things to Have Dichloromethane Poured on 'Em | Main | Vacation! »

July 3, 2012

The Papers In This Journal Are Just So Darn Relevant

Email This Entry

Posted by Derek

Thomson Reuters is out with their lists of impact factors for journals, and these come with the usual cautions: too much is made of the impact factor in general, and the very fact that the tiniest variations are seized on gleefully by journal publishers should be enough to set off alarms.

This time a record number of journals were taken off the list for excessive self-citation. And as that Nature News article notes, somewhat gleefully, one of the journals had recently been profiled by Thomson Reuters as a "Rising Star". (All that profiling and interviewing has made me wonder in the past, and I'm not surprised at all that this has happened. The company measures the impact factors, promotes them as meaningful, interviews journal editors who have found ways to raise theirs, which makes that important news because the people who sell impact factors say that it's important, and they have the press releases to prove it. I'm standing by my earlier comparison to the Franklin Mint. (And in case you're wondering, the fact that I'm citing my own blog on the topic of self-referentiality has not escaped me).

At any rate, I don't believe that any chemistry journals were on the banned list. The most interesting case was a group of journals that were deliberately citing each other, but I'll freely admit that I'd never heard of any of them, despite their best efforts to rise in the world. If anyone does have any evidence of citation oddities in the chemistry world, though, I'd be happy to help publicize them. . .

Comments (13) + TrackBacks (0) | Category: The Dark Side | The Scientific Literature


COMMENTS

1. Yoshitaka Fujii on July 3, 2012 11:39 AM writes...

This looks like a good paragraph for MY blog. On another site. With less impact. I'll then put it on my CV. (rubs hands devilishly)

Permalink to Comment

2. QuitS on July 3, 2012 2:20 PM writes...

It is damaging to science if we (unfortunately) tell young scientists that impactors are more important than the quality of the works. No wonder that science is going down the strain. With the increase of impact factors, the impact of science is decreasing!

Permalink to Comment

3. startup on July 3, 2012 3:08 PM writes...

Ratings are like Ponzi schemes, they benefit only those who put them together. No exceptions.

Permalink to Comment

4. JE on July 3, 2012 4:04 PM writes...

With the increase in the number of more specialist journals surely comes also an increase in journal self-citation rates?

It is sometimes difficult however to distinguish specialist journals which fulfil a real need from those which are set up to fulfil the needs/grant proposals of closed cartels of academics working on things that are not so interesting (to others).

Permalink to Comment

5. newnickname on July 3, 2012 5:22 PM writes...

www.youtube.com / watch?v=K1lytua2dh4&

I cite myself
I want you to cite me
When my impact's down
I want you to restore me
I search myself
I want you to find me
I forget myself
I want you to remind me

Chorus:
I don't want anybody else
When I think about you
I cite myself
I don't want anybody else
Oh no, oh no, oh no

Many citations make me happy honey
You're the sun who makes me shine
When you're around I'm always laughing
I want to make you mine

I close my eyes
And see you before me
Think I would die
If Thomas-Reuters ignored me
A fool could see
Just how much I adore you
I get down on my knees
I'd do anything for you

Permalink to Comment

6. MoMo on July 3, 2012 6:20 PM writes...

Tis a sad day when citation factors mean more then the citation itself. The zombies of publishing are taking over and eating the brains of scientists worldwide now, and I speak with them slowly and assuredly at conferences now.

I tell them real clearly and concisely

"your days are numbered-think about a career in telemarketing"

And to the scientists and their bosses, institutions in academia that think citations are everything I also tell them

"your days are numbered-think about a career in telemarketing"

They both make the world a scary place.

Permalink to Comment

7. Dennis on July 3, 2012 7:36 PM writes...

#5: lyrics by The Butadienes?

Permalink to Comment

8. Boghog on July 4, 2012 1:58 AM writes...

#7: Or after the divinyls have been ultraviolated, the semibullvalenes:

en.wikipedia.org / wiki / Di-pi-methane_rearrangement

Permalink to Comment

9. matt on July 5, 2012 1:03 PM writes...

Could you supply a link for the Franklin Mint reference, to expand on which behavior you refer to?

Permalink to Comment

10. Anon on July 5, 2012 3:07 PM writes...

Do journal editors have such inflated heads that they think their "impact factor" is as incredible this?

Permalink to Comment

11. Hap on July 5, 2012 3:15 PM writes...

9: See the link rather after the Franklin Mint mention.

Self-reference isn't problematic here, though - you aren't assuming that your opinions are important and valid because you refer to them. On the other hand, a significant portion of the perceived importance of impact factors comes from the people who calculate them saying that they're important - the self-reference is a hidden way of saying that what's being referenced is important because they say it is.

Permalink to Comment

12. kevin on July 6, 2012 9:42 AM writes...

It happens on the materials end of chemistry too. I had one paper where the editors/reviewers accepted it and then suggested strongly a list of background references to be added. All referred to the journal in question. I declined as most had no relevance at all.

Permalink to Comment

13. newnickname on July 6, 2012 11:35 AM writes...

I would just like to draw your attention to my previous publication on this topic: newnickname, "I cite myself", In the Pipeline, July 3, 2012 5:22 PM.

(@7 Dennis and @8 Boghog: Good ones!)

Permalink to Comment

POST A COMMENT




Remember Me?



EMAIL THIS ENTRY TO A FRIEND

Email this entry to:

Your email address:

Message (optional):




RELATED ENTRIES
Adoptive T-Cell Therapy for Cancer: The Short Version
How Much Is Wrong?
The 2013 Drug Approvals: Not So Great?
Positive Rules and Negative Ones
Prices Rising - Every Year, Every Drug?
Easy Aziridines
Back Blogging (Bonus Biographical Begging)
It Just So Happens That I Have A Conference Right Here