Corante

About this Author
DBL%20Hendrix%20small.png College chemistry, 1983

Derek Lowe The 2002 Model

Dbl%20new%20portrait%20B%26W.png After 10 years of blogging. . .

Derek Lowe, an Arkansan by birth, got his BA from Hendrix College and his PhD in organic chemistry from Duke before spending time in Germany on a Humboldt Fellowship on his post-doc. He's worked for several major pharmaceutical companies since 1989 on drug discovery projects against schizophrenia, Alzheimer's, diabetes, osteoporosis and other diseases. To contact Derek email him directly: derekb.lowe@gmail.com Twitter: Dereklowe

Chemistry and Drug Data: Drugbank
Emolecules
ChemSpider
Chempedia Lab
Synthetic Pages
Organic Chemistry Portal
PubChem
Not Voodoo
DailyMed
Druglib
Clinicaltrials.gov

Chemistry and Pharma Blogs:
Org Prep Daily
The Haystack
Kilomentor
A New Merck, Reviewed
Liberal Arts Chemistry
Electron Pusher
All Things Metathesis
C&E News Blogs
Chemiotics II
Chemical Space
Noel O'Blog
In Vivo Blog
Terra Sigilatta
BBSRC/Douglas Kell
ChemBark
Realizations in Biostatistics
Chemjobber
Pharmalot
ChemSpider Blog
Pharmagossip
Med-Chemist
Organic Chem - Education & Industry
Pharma Strategy Blog
No Name No Slogan
Practical Fragments
SimBioSys
The Curious Wavefunction
Natural Product Man
Fragment Literature
Chemistry World Blog
Synthetic Nature
Chemistry Blog
Synthesizing Ideas
Business|Bytes|Genes|Molecules
Eye on FDA
Chemical Forums
Depth-First
Symyx Blog
Sceptical Chymist
Lamentations on Chemistry
Computational Organic Chemistry
Mining Drugs
Henry Rzepa


Science Blogs and News:
Bad Science
The Loom
Uncertain Principles
Fierce Biotech
Blogs for Industry
Omics! Omics!
Young Female Scientist
Notional Slurry
Nobel Intent
SciTech Daily
Science Blog
FuturePundit
Aetiology
Gene Expression (I)
Gene Expression (II)
Sciencebase
Pharyngula
Adventures in Ethics and Science
Transterrestrial Musings
Slashdot Science
Cosmic Variance
Biology News Net


Medical Blogs
DB's Medical Rants
Science-Based Medicine
GruntDoc
Respectful Insolence
Diabetes Mine


Economics and Business
Marginal Revolution
The Volokh Conspiracy
Knowledge Problem


Politics / Current Events
Virginia Postrel
Instapundit
Belmont Club
Mickey Kaus


Belles Lettres
Uncouth Reflections
Arts and Letters Daily
In the Pipeline: Don't miss Derek Lowe's excellent commentary on drug discovery and the pharma industry in general at In the Pipeline

In the Pipeline

« DHFR Inhibitors Revisited: A Word From the Authors (and Reviewers) | Main | Different Worlds: A Last DHFR Paper Thought »

April 26, 2012

Elsevier Picks Up the Pace

Email This Entry

Posted by Derek

So perhaps I should rethink all those nasty things I've been saying about Elsevier journals. Here's someone who submitted a paper to Nuclear Instruments and Methods on a Friday evening, and got it accepted - with two referee reports, yet - on Monday morning. How is that possible, you say? That's what this author is wondering, too. . .

Comments (8) + TrackBacks (0) | Category: The Scientific Literature


COMMENTS

1. anon for this one on April 26, 2012 1:13 PM writes...

Technically, it can be one work day as well, if the editor and both of the reviewers are based in Israel. Sunday is a workday. Editor receives looks at the paper Saturday evening if they are bored and sends if off to the reviewers, they review it on Sunday. Monday is a second workday for the editor to look at the review and send off the positive response with the time difference meaning the authors in the US can receive it Monday morning. So, it's two workdays that could have gone into the review and two weekend days.

Still, I agree it's unlikely.

Permalink to Comment

2. anon for this one on April 26, 2012 1:21 PM writes...

Sorry, I meant: "two workdays and 'not' two weekend days".


The editor is based in the USA, and I doubt both of the reviewers would be Israeli. Maybe from some of the Muslim countries with lots of experience in Nuclear Instruments and Methods that also have Sunday as a workday? Ummm.... Iran? I would hate to know that the relevant reviewers came from Saudi or Algeria. We have enough problems.

In that respect, I'm hoping for good, old-fashioned shenanigans.

Permalink to Comment

3. Sean on April 26, 2012 2:14 PM writes...

I hope they follow up and link to the article when it is published. Based on the of recent JACS paper incident it seems the internet maybe providing a critical contribution to the peer review process.

Permalink to Comment

4. VIrgil on April 26, 2012 3:56 PM writes...

You want editorial fun? Try this for size...

Paper sent in to a mid-low ranked journal, rejected in 2 days at the editorial level (no reviews) for being "not of significant enough impact to warrant publication". Wrote an appeal to the EiC (blah blah, of course it's significant you moron!) 2 days later get a computer generated email congratulating me on having the paper accepted by the journal, and giving details on how to upload all the reqired files for publication (hi-res images etc.) Sent in the files, got the paper in press and with page #s. About 3 months later got an email from the EiC saying they had looked at our appeal and would be sending it out for peer review after all. I politely pointed out it was already in print, and got no response. Weird!

Permalink to Comment

5. Giovanni Appendino on April 26, 2012 10:54 PM writes...

I edit a science Journal, and do most of my editorial duties over the weekend. I know of other Editors who do the same. I have occasionally received comments by reviewers over the weekend. So, technically it could have happened, especially for contributions like Short Notes and when the Editor is familiar with the topic of the article. Maybe the Editor himself or herself acted as a second reviewer.

Permalink to Comment

6. Reviewer 1 on April 27, 2012 6:11 AM writes...

With regard to the turnaround time, I think this is possible and I think it ideally should be the norm. Do anybody have the time to spend more than one day on reviewing a paper? I often do reviewing on Sunday, but I have a bad habit of postponing until just before the deadline. It would be better to do it immediately. That said, is seems like the reviewers took the job a bit easy in this case, with only one of them finding one single spelling error. (Anyway, the journal gets what it pays for...)

@1&2: Is it really your impression that all Christians and atheists in science take the weekend off?

Permalink to Comment

7. anon for this one on April 27, 2012 7:17 AM writes...

Reviewer 1, I lived among you, so I know that you culturally weak heathens disrespect the day of even your own lord!

Plus, my comments were meant to be more of a joke, written in sarcastic font...

Permalink to Comment

8. cookingwithsolvents on April 29, 2012 12:04 PM writes...

Who reviews papers during the week? The weekend is about the only time I get to them unless I'm traveling and have time on the plane. I agree it's probably odd and this particular instance may not be on the up-and-up but I can easily see a 3-day turnaround on a paper. The title indicates it's instruments and methods so presumably there is not an involved discussion of the tool/method (is the data better or not? do you believe that it is?).

Permalink to Comment

POST A COMMENT




Remember Me?



EMAIL THIS ENTRY TO A FRIEND

Email this entry to:

Your email address:

Message (optional):




RELATED ENTRIES
How Not to Do It: NMR Magnets
Allergan Escapes Valeant
Vytorin Actually Works
Fatalities at DuPont
The New York TImes on Drug Discovery
How Are Things at Princeton?
Phage-Derived Catalysts
Our Most Snorted-At Papers This Month. . .