Corante

About this Author
DBL%20Hendrix%20small.png College chemistry, 1983

Derek Lowe The 2002 Model

Dbl%20new%20portrait%20B%26W.png After 10 years of blogging. . .

Derek Lowe, an Arkansan by birth, got his BA from Hendrix College and his PhD in organic chemistry from Duke before spending time in Germany on a Humboldt Fellowship on his post-doc. He's worked for several major pharmaceutical companies since 1989 on drug discovery projects against schizophrenia, Alzheimer's, diabetes, osteoporosis and other diseases. To contact Derek email him directly: derekb.lowe@gmail.com Twitter: Dereklowe

Chemistry and Drug Data: Drugbank
Emolecules
ChemSpider
Chempedia Lab
Synthetic Pages
Organic Chemistry Portal
PubChem
Not Voodoo
DailyMed
Druglib
Clinicaltrials.gov

Chemistry and Pharma Blogs:
Org Prep Daily
The Haystack
Kilomentor
A New Merck, Reviewed
Liberal Arts Chemistry
Electron Pusher
All Things Metathesis
C&E News Blogs
Chemiotics II
Chemical Space
Noel O'Blog
In Vivo Blog
Terra Sigilatta
BBSRC/Douglas Kell
ChemBark
Realizations in Biostatistics
Chemjobber
Pharmalot
ChemSpider Blog
Pharmagossip
Med-Chemist
Organic Chem - Education & Industry
Pharma Strategy Blog
No Name No Slogan
Practical Fragments
SimBioSys
The Curious Wavefunction
Natural Product Man
Fragment Literature
Chemistry World Blog
Synthetic Nature
Chemistry Blog
Synthesizing Ideas
Business|Bytes|Genes|Molecules
Eye on FDA
Chemical Forums
Depth-First
Symyx Blog
Sceptical Chymist
Lamentations on Chemistry
Computational Organic Chemistry
Mining Drugs
Henry Rzepa


Science Blogs and News:
Bad Science
The Loom
Uncertain Principles
Fierce Biotech
Blogs for Industry
Omics! Omics!
Young Female Scientist
Notional Slurry
Nobel Intent
SciTech Daily
Science Blog
FuturePundit
Aetiology
Gene Expression (I)
Gene Expression (II)
Sciencebase
Pharyngula
Adventures in Ethics and Science
Transterrestrial Musings
Slashdot Science
Cosmic Variance
Biology News Net


Medical Blogs
DB's Medical Rants
Science-Based Medicine
GruntDoc
Respectful Insolence
Diabetes Mine


Economics and Business
Marginal Revolution
The Volokh Conspiracy
Knowledge Problem


Politics / Current Events
Virginia Postrel
Instapundit
Belmont Club
Mickey Kaus


Belles Lettres
Uncouth Reflections
Arts and Letters Daily
In the Pipeline: Don't miss Derek Lowe's excellent commentary on drug discovery and the pharma industry in general at In the Pipeline

In the Pipeline

« MMR Vaccine and Autism: Lies, All Lies | Main | The PhD Problem »

January 6, 2011

Storage of Industrial Chemicals, Gone Rather Wrong

Email This Entry

Posted by Derek

What do you have when a fire starts at a large chemical packing company, handling all sorts of oils, paints, coatings, and various industrial chemicals? Where they have hundreds of thousand-liter containers stored, surrounded by all the crates and packing material used to trans-ship them? You have this, at Chemie-Pack in the Netherlands yesterday:
m1fzum3alhd7.jpg
And you have a black cloud that stretched across a significant part of the whole country:
m1fzumba2rm7.jpg
Images are from Nufoto.nl, taken by people at the scene. A reader who lives 20km downwind writes me that he's been getting a pervasive smell of burnt plastic (which, he says, certainly makes a change). His main reason to be grateful is that this didn't spread to the Shell site nearby, which would have prompted an instant vacation to Germany. And then there are all the refineries 15 km to the west - if those ever go up, he tells me, "it'll look like the ending of Gulf War 1 - lowlands-style - with cows for camels".

Comments (15) + TrackBacks (0) | Category: How Not to Do It


COMMENTS

1. Keeees on January 6, 2011 10:47 AM writes...

And then there's this picture:

http://www.volkskrant.nl/static/FOTO/pe/2/14/0/album_large_506580.jpg

The last line on that sign reads: "Dependable handling of chemical products".

I rather doubt the framing of that shot was by accident.

Permalink to Comment

2. John Spevacek on January 6, 2011 2:23 PM writes...

"...smell of burnt plastic..."

We can certainly do better than that, right? Burning polyethylene smells different than polypropylene, and different than nylon, PVC (which give off HCl), polycarbonate...

In fact, the smoke test used to be a fairly common and effective method for identifying plastics.

Permalink to Comment

3. Joe T. on January 6, 2011 4:01 PM writes...

Is that just a shadow under the cloud in the second photo... or is it a rain of toxic soot?

Permalink to Comment

4. Nicolai Plum on January 6, 2011 4:12 PM writes...

I saw this from the window of an aircraft approaching Amsterdam yesterday, clearly visible as a large smoky fire. "Oops".

Permalink to Comment

5. flavor on January 6, 2011 4:14 PM writes...

@2 I'm in the smelling business, but I never did the 'recognize the type of burning plastic course' It reminded me mostly of the burned plastic that kit-models are made of.

Permalink to Comment

6. flavor on January 6, 2011 4:14 PM writes...

@2 I'm in the smelling business, but I never did the 'recognize the type of burning plastic course' It reminded me mostly of the burned plastic that kit-models are made of.

Permalink to Comment

7. smeller on January 6, 2011 6:09 PM writes...

I want to be in the (nice) smelling business too!

Permalink to Comment

8. Brooks on January 6, 2011 8:32 PM writes...

@flavor: For typical model kits, that would be styrene.

Permalink to Comment

9. OldLabRat on January 6, 2011 9:11 PM writes...

Reminds me of the Sherwin-Williams warehouse fire in Dayton, OH in May, 1987. About 1.5MM gal of paints, varnishes, etc up in a very large smoke plume. The flames were visible for several miles as might be expected.
My lab at the time was on the line between my apartment and the fire, which produced a bit of a jolt when I got home and saw the flames. I had left a reaction going overnight with a low condensor flow to avoid floods...

Permalink to Comment

10. Petros on January 7, 2011 9:45 AM writes...

Mind you when the Buncefield oil storage depot (60 million gallons) went up the shock waves were felt 60 to 70 miles away

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buncefield_fire

had it not been a Sunday there would have been lots of deaths

Permalink to Comment

11. Nile on January 7, 2011 11:07 AM writes...

In reply to Joe T: yes the soot is probably toxic and mildly carcinogenic... If you live in it, bathe in it, and eat it on a regular basis. One-off exposures will probably do no more than cause irritated mucosa.

The word 'probably' is the problem. The possibility that the soot contains (say) dioxins is low but nonzero.

Breathing the smoke would cause immediate injury, and very likely cause lasting damage, but you knew that already.

Permalink to Comment

12. Bored on January 8, 2011 11:22 PM writes...

A warehouse near my old apartment caught fire back in the '80's. It was full of pallets of nylon stockings. It smelled all the world like burning celery.

Permalink to Comment

13. GreedyCynicalSelfInterested on January 9, 2011 6:55 PM writes...

OOPS! That reminds me, gotta go clean out my garage.

Permalink to Comment

14. Alex on January 10, 2011 6:58 PM writes...

The Buncefield shock wave woke me up. For the next couple of weeks you could see the plume running along the northern horizon from central London, if you had a clear view to the north-west.

The amusing bit was the press hysteria. I remember vividly the Evening Standard's headline: POISON CLOUDS HIT TONIGHT! as I came out of work one night. Very John Wyndham. Of course nothing happened.

However, the fire brigade did run through pretty much the whole national reserve stock of foam concentrates, and Thames Water ended up with an enormous tank full of highly toxic foam/oil/water/combustion products mix for months while they tried to work out how to reduce it to a condition where it could be released into a river or at least the sea without killing the North Sea, London, or at least mutilating the law.

Permalink to Comment

15. Ilja on January 11, 2011 8:44 PM writes...

The really scary bit is not the Shell refinery 2 doors down, but the company actually next door.

No, not Wartsila, though that was an amount of money wasted that is just not funny.

But Afval Terminal Moerdijk, a waste disposal company, specialising in chemical waste, including ship's flushings (they where the only company in The Netherlands that could have processed the Probo Koala waste), if that place caught fire the whole Rotterdam region would have to be evacuated. Though, their own fire service, fixed fire extinguishing systems and site design prevented anything from catching fire there.

Both them and Shell had sufficient trust in the fire not spreading that their company fire services assisted in putting out the blaze.

Permalink to Comment

POST A COMMENT




Remember Me?



EMAIL THIS ENTRY TO A FRIEND

Email this entry to:

Your email address:

Message (optional):




RELATED ENTRIES
The Worst Seminar
Conference in Basel
Messed-Up Clinical Studies: A First-Hand Report
Pharma and Ebola
Lilly Steps In for AstraZeneca's Secretase Inhibitor
Update on Alnylam (And the Direction of Things to Come)
There Must Have Been Multiple Chances to Catch This
Weirdly, Tramadol Is Not a Natural Product After All