« Where Drugs Come From: The Numbers |
| Peer Review's Problems »
November 4, 2010
Finally, An Alternative to Palladium. About Time.
A reader sent this paper along the other day. Is it just me, or does it seem a bit odd to talk about how aryl coupling in these systems is traditionally done by (list of metal-catalyzed reactions), which unfortunately involve (list of toxic and/or expensive metals) under (list of rigorous conditions involving oxygen exclusion and protecting groups). . .and then propose as a shiny new alternative: three equivalents of aluminum chloride?
Not that there's anything particularly wrong with aluminum chloride. The workup is much nastier than with the metal-catalyzed couplings, though, and I'd think that the waste stream is also more hefty. And I'm willing to bet that a lot more structures can survive Suzuki coupling conditions than can survive scoops of aluminum chloride, too. But it certainly is a lot cheaper and simpler to set up.
Still, isn't this just more or less the aryl-Friedel-Crafts (Scholl) reaction? And haven't very similar couplings been reported before, many times? This new paper cites a few of these (but not that last one). Maybe it's just the whole "Now we can finally get rid of all that palladium" tone. . .
+ TrackBacks (0) | Category: Chemical News
POST A COMMENT
- RELATED ENTRIES
- Bernard Munos on The Last Twelve Years of Pharma
- Pay-to-Delay: Not Necessarily Illegal, But Not Long For The World
- GPCRs Are As Crazy As You Thought
- Aggravating Aggregators
- Making Changes Inside Merck's R&D
- One. . .Million. . .Pounds (For a New Antibiotic?)
- A Beta-Secretase Inhibitor Hits the Skids in Alzheimer's
- The Supreme Court Rules on Myriad