« How Not to Do It: Liquid Oxygen Cylinders |
| Intermune's Rise »
March 10, 2010
Vaccines in the Court
The Supreme Court has agreed to hear a vaccine-liability case, in an attempt to untangle conflicting lower court rulings. This all turns on the 1986 act that shields manufacturers from liability suits and a followup law that establishes a separate compensation system for injuries. A Georgia Supreme Court ruling has recently held that such suits can go on in state court, which seems to contradict other court decisions (and the intent of the 1986 law as well, you'd think).
I agree with Jim Edwards of BNET that although this particular case involves the DPT vaccine, the vaccines-cause-autism crowd will be watching this one very closely. Lawsuits will no doubt be ready to fly later this year in case the Supreme Court breaks that way - which seems to me unlikely, but I'm no judge. . .
+ TrackBacks (0) | Category: Autism | Regulatory Affairs | Toxicology
POST A COMMENT
- RELATED ENTRIES
- How Many Binding Pockets Are There?
- Promoting STEM Education, Foolishly
- But Don't Drug Companies Spend More on Marketing?
- How Much Do Drug Companies Spend on R&D, Anyway?
- A Little Ranbaxy Example
- Ranbaxy: Looking Under the Rock
- The Atlantic on Drug R&D
- And The Award For Clinical Futility Goes To. . .