Corante

About this Author
DBL%20Hendrix%20small.png College chemistry, 1983

Derek Lowe The 2002 Model

Dbl%20new%20portrait%20B%26W.png After 10 years of blogging. . .

Derek Lowe, an Arkansan by birth, got his BA from Hendrix College and his PhD in organic chemistry from Duke before spending time in Germany on a Humboldt Fellowship on his post-doc. He's worked for several major pharmaceutical companies since 1989 on drug discovery projects against schizophrenia, Alzheimer's, diabetes, osteoporosis and other diseases. To contact Derek email him directly: derekb.lowe@gmail.com Twitter: Dereklowe

Chemistry and Drug Data: Drugbank
Emolecules
ChemSpider
Chempedia Lab
Synthetic Pages
Organic Chemistry Portal
PubChem
Not Voodoo
DailyMed
Druglib
Clinicaltrials.gov

Chemistry and Pharma Blogs:
Org Prep Daily
The Haystack
Kilomentor
A New Merck, Reviewed
Liberal Arts Chemistry
Electron Pusher
All Things Metathesis
C&E News Blogs
Chemiotics II
Chemical Space
Noel O'Blog
In Vivo Blog
Terra Sigilatta
BBSRC/Douglas Kell
ChemBark
Realizations in Biostatistics
Chemjobber
Pharmalot
ChemSpider Blog
Pharmagossip
Med-Chemist
Organic Chem - Education & Industry
Pharma Strategy Blog
No Name No Slogan
Practical Fragments
SimBioSys
The Curious Wavefunction
Natural Product Man
Fragment Literature
Chemistry World Blog
Synthetic Nature
Chemistry Blog
Synthesizing Ideas
Business|Bytes|Genes|Molecules
Eye on FDA
Chemical Forums
Depth-First
Symyx Blog
Sceptical Chymist
Lamentations on Chemistry
Computational Organic Chemistry
Mining Drugs
Henry Rzepa


Science Blogs and News:
Bad Science
The Loom
Uncertain Principles
Fierce Biotech
Blogs for Industry
Omics! Omics!
Young Female Scientist
Notional Slurry
Nobel Intent
SciTech Daily
Science Blog
FuturePundit
Aetiology
Gene Expression (I)
Gene Expression (II)
Sciencebase
Pharyngula
Adventures in Ethics and Science
Transterrestrial Musings
Slashdot Science
Cosmic Variance
Biology News Net


Medical Blogs
DB's Medical Rants
Science-Based Medicine
GruntDoc
Respectful Insolence
Diabetes Mine


Economics and Business
Marginal Revolution
The Volokh Conspiracy
Knowledge Problem


Politics / Current Events
Virginia Postrel
Instapundit
Belmont Club
Mickey Kaus


Belles Lettres
Uncouth Reflections
Arts and Letters Daily
In the Pipeline: Don't miss Derek Lowe's excellent commentary on drug discovery and the pharma industry in general at In the Pipeline

In the Pipeline

« Merck Actually Does It | Main | Merck/Schering-Plough: Waiting for J&J To Raise Their Hand »

March 9, 2009

The Merck Deal and the SEC: Not a Joke

Email This Entry

Posted by Derek

And I thought that I was kidding, at least a bit, in my post where I warned some of the folks buying into Schering-Plough last week that they might be hearing from the SEC. Well, maybe not - whenever a deal like this goes through, the first place they look is in the options market:

Some lucky option players appeared to have reaped a windfall with Schering-Plough call options rocketing after Merck on Monday announced a proposed $41.1 billion takeover of the drugmaker.

. . .a burst of activity in the stock's call options last Tuesday and again on Friday may be too much of a coincidence to overlook and prompted some option traders to ask if inside word of the pending deal reached some investors.

"Our examination of the data suggests a high degree of likelihood that someone did indeed place what I will be politically correct and call nicely timed trades," said Jon Najarian, a founder of Web information site optionmonster.com, in an email to Reuters.

Good luck explaining these, is all I can say. Telling them how lucky you felt that day won't make the folks from the enforcement division go away. As a lawyer in this business once said to me at a meeting, "I have to make sure that no one in this company trades our stock on material information. And material information is defined as something that makes you think about trading the stock."

Comments (3) + TrackBacks (0) | Category: Business and Markets | The Dark Side


COMMENTS

1. Anonymous BMS Researcher on March 10, 2009 10:27 PM writes...

Most of my money is in places other than the pharmaceutical industry for two main reasons:

1. Ethics: the best way I know to avoid unintentionally using insider information is to invest in places where I do not have inside information.

2. Diversity: my wife and I both work in this industry, so our careers represent a substantial personal investment in pharma. On the "don't put all your eggs in one basket" principle, we therefore feel safer putting our money elsewhere.

Permalink to Comment

2. Anon on March 11, 2009 1:52 PM writes...

It tickles my heart that the same SEC that couldn't do anything to stop the $65 billion Madoff debacle (after they were informed years before) spend their time worrying about a few 'well timed trades.' Not that insider trading is alright, but with the recent disaster on Wall Street one might think that there would be better things to prosecute...

Permalink to Comment

3. Hap on March 11, 2009 5:28 PM writes...

Why'd MLB spend so much time going after Pete Rose while players left and right were juicing themselves into the record books? Steroids suck because the players screwed their own (more talented) compatriots for cash and records, but neither the players, the owners, the press, or the fans seemed to much care - they could trust (mostly what they saw) and that the games were honest. Betting on baseball brings up the possibility that you could fiddle the outcomes of games for your own (or your bookies') benefit - so all of a sudden, fans can't trust that the outcome of games is legitimate but is instead being controlled from elsewhere.

Madoff seems to have been a thief, but he didn't compromise the market - he just depended on his victims' greed and trust to rob them blind. Insider trading, on the other hand, brings the possibility that a few people could use their knowledge to control the market - once the game is rigged (or people believe it to be so), there ceases to be a point in people playing it, and the exchanges and the SEC no longer have a mission (and a lot of people don't have jobs or money). Madoff's acts don't necessarily threaten the trust of people in the market, but insider trading does, which might explain the differing outcomes. (Plus the criminal people can handle Madoff - I'm sure he'll meet lots of new friends where he goes).

Permalink to Comment

POST A COMMENT




Remember Me?



EMAIL THIS ENTRY TO A FRIEND

Email this entry to:

Your email address:

Message (optional):




RELATED ENTRIES
The Palbociclib Saga: Or Why We Need a Lot of Drug Companies
Why Not Bromine?
Fragonomics, Eh?
Amicus Fights Its Way Through in Fabry's
Did Pfizer Cut Back Some of Its Best Compounds?
Don't Optimize Your Plasma Protein Binding
Fluorinated Fingerprinting
One of Those Days