About this Author
DBL%20Hendrix%20small.png College chemistry, 1983

Derek Lowe The 2002 Model

Dbl%20new%20portrait%20B%26W.png After 10 years of blogging. . .

Derek Lowe, an Arkansan by birth, got his BA from Hendrix College and his PhD in organic chemistry from Duke before spending time in Germany on a Humboldt Fellowship on his post-doc. He's worked for several major pharmaceutical companies since 1989 on drug discovery projects against schizophrenia, Alzheimer's, diabetes, osteoporosis and other diseases. To contact Derek email him directly: Twitter: Dereklowe

Chemistry and Drug Data: Drugbank
Chempedia Lab
Synthetic Pages
Organic Chemistry Portal
Not Voodoo

Chemistry and Pharma Blogs:
Org Prep Daily
The Haystack
A New Merck, Reviewed
Liberal Arts Chemistry
Electron Pusher
All Things Metathesis
C&E News Blogs
Chemiotics II
Chemical Space
Noel O'Blog
In Vivo Blog
Terra Sigilatta
BBSRC/Douglas Kell
Realizations in Biostatistics
ChemSpider Blog
Organic Chem - Education & Industry
Pharma Strategy Blog
No Name No Slogan
Practical Fragments
The Curious Wavefunction
Natural Product Man
Fragment Literature
Chemistry World Blog
Synthetic Nature
Chemistry Blog
Synthesizing Ideas
Eye on FDA
Chemical Forums
Symyx Blog
Sceptical Chymist
Lamentations on Chemistry
Computational Organic Chemistry
Mining Drugs
Henry Rzepa

Science Blogs and News:
Bad Science
The Loom
Uncertain Principles
Fierce Biotech
Blogs for Industry
Omics! Omics!
Young Female Scientist
Notional Slurry
Nobel Intent
SciTech Daily
Science Blog
Gene Expression (I)
Gene Expression (II)
Adventures in Ethics and Science
Transterrestrial Musings
Slashdot Science
Cosmic Variance
Biology News Net

Medical Blogs
DB's Medical Rants
Science-Based Medicine
Respectful Insolence
Diabetes Mine

Economics and Business
Marginal Revolution
The Volokh Conspiracy
Knowledge Problem

Politics / Current Events
Virginia Postrel
Belmont Club
Mickey Kaus

Belles Lettres
Uncouth Reflections
Arts and Letters Daily
In the Pipeline: Don't miss Derek Lowe's excellent commentary on drug discovery and the pharma industry in general at In the Pipeline

In the Pipeline

« Pfizer / Wyeth: They're Going to Take Us All Down With Them | Main | Pfizer / Wyeth: Different This Time? »

January 23, 2009

The Real Hazards of the Lab

Email This Entry

Posted by Derek

A run of bad accident news today, and all of the same kind. The Chemistry Blog has the story of a fatality in the labs at UCLA. The short and painful details are: inexperienced student, t-butyllithium, flammable clothing, and panic (as in not running toward the safety shower).

This is very sad to hear about, and as with so many lab accidents, one of the saddest parts is how easily it could have been prevented. t-BuLi is, of course, a well-known fire starter, and the student did know about that problem. But one of the keys to working with dangerous substances is to think through what you’ll do if something goes wrong. For a pyrophoric compound, that means knowing where the nearest fire extinguisher and safety shower are. It’s very easy to panic when something goes wrong, but if you’ve rehearsed what to do beforehand, you have a much better chance of doing the right thing in tough circumstances.

I pass this along to the students who read this site, and I’m sure the other experienced lab workers here will agree: always think “OK, what’s the worst thing that can go wrong with this reaction?”, and think about what you’ll do if that happens. Fire? Explosion? Sudden leak of nasty toxic stuff? Think it over. Anyone working in a laboratory should always know where the nearest fire extinguisher is. That is, the nearest appropriate one – if you’ve got a separate Class D model for metal fires, or even just a sand bucket, then when you need it you’re really going to need it. And everyone should know where the nearest safety shower is, because no one ever just sort of needs to use one of those. I’ve had to run and pull one once in my career, and let me tell you, it was a damned good thing that I knew where to go when the chips were down.

The other news I have was communicated to me privately, so I won’t go into details other than to say that it appears to be another fatality, this time involving inhalation exposure to trimethylsilyl diazomethane. The problem with these sorts of reagents is that you might think that they’d cause breathing trouble immediately, but you’d be wrong. Diazomethane, phosgene, methyl bromide and others can actually take hours to kill a person, and for a good part of that time, the only symptoms might be a slight cough. But serious lung damage can be coming on slowly during that period, and by the time it’s clear that there’s a problem it’s usually too late to do very much about it. Unfortunately, in some cases, it’s too late right from the start, but that takes quite a bit of exposure, and indicates a serious mistake somewhere along the line.

Anyone who works with such volatile and damaging reagents needs to be completely aware of what they’re doing, and to only handle them under good ventilation. I’ve used such things many, many times in my career, without incident, and so have most working organic chemists. But we should never lose respect for what we’re holding in our hands.

I’m not trying to scare beginning chemists out of doing lab work. It has it hazards, but so does driving to work in the morning or cutting up food for dinner. (When I was in graduate school, my mother once expressed her worries about my lab work, but I told her that the most dangerous thing I did was to drive 650 miles back home on holidays). But every well-appointed chemistry lab is full of death in screw-capped bottles, and that bears thinking about. Random, unforeseeable accidents are, fortunately, very rare. But that means that the others didn’t have to happen, and that’s painful to contemplate.

Comments (65) + TrackBacks (0) | Category: Chemical News | Graduate School | Life in the Drug Labs


1. NH_chem on January 23, 2009 10:46 AM writes...

Being prepared for the worst and hoping for the best is always what my adviser said. This is something that I always kept in mind.

The time when a POCl3 quench went terribly wrong, I was prepared although it is never fun to inhale that lovely stuff!

Great advice. Chemistry is dangerous but so is driving your car...........

Permalink to Comment

2. Russ on January 23, 2009 10:55 AM writes...

As you point out, Derek, there are substances which cause no initial irritation but are rapidly absorbed on the pulmonary surface. The subsequent hydrolysis or alkylation is irreversible and can be fatal.

It took years for me to get comfortable with the protection that a hood sash affords the maximum amount of body area possible.

Permalink to Comment

3. Mark M on January 23, 2009 11:03 AM writes...

This is awful, and, regrettably, preventable.

From the blog you reference:

"Somehow, the syringe plunger popped out or was pulled out of the syringe barrel, splashing the employee with t-bu-Li and pentane. The mixture caught fire, upon contact with air. She was wearing nitrile gloves, safety glasses and synthetic sweater. She was not wearing a lab coat. "

This immediately brings to mind several actions that could have ameliorated this:

1. ALWAYS WEAR A LAB COAT (she would have had her sweater between her and the burning lab coat)

2. work with the hood sash down as far as practical, whenever possible and always when handling pyrophorics or inhalable toxins

3. unless you really know what you are doing, use an 18 gauge needle (not 20 as stated in the report) with a 60 mL glass syringe

4. for the PI:

a) make your newer employees prove to you they know how to use the Ar line before letting them loose in the lab

b) be mindful that females may not have the same hand strenght as males when using a 60 mL syringe--train your people to ask for help for critical manipulations for which they find themselves straining or applying excessive force.

Permalink to Comment

4. buyproduct on January 23, 2009 11:24 AM writes...

Mark M, you recommend a glass syringe over a plastic disposable one? I always found glass syringes to be more accident prone. I prefer the plastic ones because they have a tighter seal. I always test out the plastic syringe when I measure out a new reagent to ensure it does not react with the plastic and or melt it. Glass slides to easy for me, allowing for pops and less control in dropwise additions.

Permalink to Comment

5. Petros on January 23, 2009 11:31 AM writes...

Horrific, but no lab coat!

I used bottle of the BuLis while doing ny PhD and while t-BuLi was the worst, and a shock the first time or two as the odd flaming drop fell off the syringe, I soon got used to it. The worst experience was dispsoing of bottles after the cold store they were kept in had been flooded.

As for buyproduct's comment I wouldn't fancy a plastic syringe for t-BuLi

Permalink to Comment

6. FormerMolecModeler on January 23, 2009 11:50 AM writes...

Very sad. When I did synthesis, there were reagents I always had extra respect for, and alkyl lithiums were at the top of the list. Always wore lab coat + gloves for those.

BuLi is relatively tame (but still dangerous), but tBuLi is nasty. Very easy for syringe to get jammed.

Permalink to Comment

7. Kai on January 23, 2009 11:52 AM writes...

Despite your attempt to not scare off young chemists, it is for these reasons that I am no longer in chemistry. After three years in my undergraduate research lab, I would see accidents occur to others, hear horror stories from others, and once had an unexpected spray of hydrofluoric acid come off of our electrochemical etching setup.

Luckily everything was in a hood, but I believe that is when I decided that I would leave the chemistry to others and merely use their expertise in conjunction with proteins.

Permalink to Comment

8. RTW on January 23, 2009 12:18 PM writes...

A major part of these problems could have been ameliorated if the PI, and or other responsible person in the LAB supervised people unfamiliar with using these reagents initially. t-BuLi is perhaps the worse organometallic to use in the lab. Someone that had never used it specifically before would be well advised to have someone watch them when handling the stuff, just to have an extra set of eyes, and hand should something go wrong. This makes for a positive experience and perhaps establishes proper respect for the reagent up front.

Secondly I also vote for the plastic disposable syringe, but I would perhaps used smaller easier to handle quantities. Say 3 times 20 or even 6 times 10. It would have been safer to only extract smaller amounts from the bottle.

I was fortunate in my undergraduate research days to use these materials, and also had a full professor that would come observe and teach proper laboratory technique. Unfortunately another fellow down the hall wasn't as lucky and managed to blow his professors lab and himself up. He survived but just barely. Issue was one of experience, and supervision. Handling of far too large of quantities at one time.

Fortunately the people that responded didn't panic or it could have been much worse.

Permalink to Comment

9. Kent G. Budge on January 23, 2009 12:48 PM writes...

A physical chemist friend once had a large cylinder of liquid nitrogen fall over when he was working alone late at night. His instinct was to catch the cylinder before it hit the concrete floor.

Unfortunately, the stopcock was open and a steady trickle of liquid nitrogen ran across the back of his hand as he struggled to pull the cylinder back into an upright position. Left an *impressive* scar.

Liquid nitrogen. What could be more innocuous?

Permalink to Comment

10. Hap on January 23, 2009 12:48 PM writes...

Is TMSCHN2 used because it doesn't require previous prepn. or becaue it is less volatile and explosive than CH2N2 (or both)? For some reason, I didn't think TMSdiazomethane was hazardous, which would be a bigger oops if there were the possibility of working with it.

Perhaps you might ask the person who communicated the story to you to write a sanitized (of propietary knowledge version) for CEN or someplace else that gets safety news.

Permalink to Comment

11. milkshake on January 23, 2009 12:52 PM writes...

I use plastic syringes for alkyl lithiums without problem, the 20mL, 5mL and 3mL sizes work particularly well. The big 50mL syringes however are useless and should be avoided, larger quantities are best transfered by canula or in multiplies of 20. You want to be careful not to pull the plunger all the way out and having stuff suddenly pouring out on you hand and sleeve.

At my first company we had a dude who incinerated his whole hood with tBuLi - he decided to reflux (!!) his material in excess of neat tBuLi, about 100mL of it.

Also small fires can be put out when you dump your dry ice bucket on them - lot less messy than powder fire extinguisher, and no safety incident paperwork to fill afterwards

Permalink to Comment

12. imarx on January 23, 2009 12:57 PM writes...

Does anyone know of a resource (perhaps online) for practical warnings wrt the usage of chemicals? I've always been frustrated with the uselessness of MSDS (which makes sodium chloride sound like a hazardous substance) and the warning labels on the bottles aren't much more helpful. I wish there were some compendium of practical knowledge about how to deal with particular chemicals. For example, a colleague recently informed me that osmium tetraoxide is really bad for your eyes. I'd never have known that if he hadn't told me. Derek's TMS-diazomethane story is another example of useful knowledge that you wouldn't necessarily get from reading the label on the bottle.

Is there someplace where people can separate out the really really bad stuff from the "fine as long as you don't eat it" stuff and provide specific tips on safe handling?

Permalink to Comment

13. Bethany Halford on January 23, 2009 1:12 PM writes...

Probably not as comprehensive as what you're after, imarx, but C&EN does keep an archive of the chemical safety letters it has received since 1993.

Permalink to Comment

14. Hap on January 23, 2009 1:28 PM writes...

Being volatile is usually a problem - OsO4 is a good oxidant, but its problems with eyes stem from its volatility at ambient temperature (it has a a high vapor pressure, and so it gets into your eyes and oxidizes them, giving Os metal in the eyes - Os metal when exposed to air gives OsO4 in significant quantities). The war gas/pseudo war gases (methylating agents, phosgene, diazomethane/TMSdiazomethane, etc.) are volatile enough to get into your lungs, and those in particular give no sign of having done so...until you can't breathe.

Fluka's catalog general gives summaries of the hazards of the chemicals, and I assume others do as well. I think CEN has searchable safety messages (letters to the editor on safety incidents).

Permalink to Comment

15. Jose on January 23, 2009 1:36 PM writes...

The best source of real safety data is the NIOSH pocket guide (online)- actually separates extreme nasties (dimethyl sulfate, HMPA, etc) from the humdrum.

Permalink to Comment

16. bill on January 23, 2009 1:38 PM writes...


While I understand your concern about refluxing in t-buli.

If you look up the synthesis of (t-bu)3SiH you will see that it calls for taking (t-bu)2SiF2 and adding t-buli in excess. Then you distill out the pentane the t-buli comes in and add a high boiling solvent (?decane? I'm not sure) and refluxing for 24 hours or so.

So, while it may not have been appropriate for you colleague's reaction, it does have precedent.

Though following this blog, there are many things with precedent I would not want to work with.

Permalink to Comment

17. Ralos on January 23, 2009 1:43 PM writes...

Very sad to hear this news.

During my PhD, my advisor had a strict protocal when using alkyl lithium or other nasty reagents. As previously posted, protective equipment, safety glass, gloves, and face shield were mandatory. But, an added rule was to have a person standing behind you with a Fire Extinguisher and someone else responsible near by to lend aid when using something as dangerous as t-BuLi. For t-BuLi, our group kept to smaller glass syringes (~10 to 20 mL max) which provided the greatest control.

In my postdoc, my prof added pre-task analyses for safety before using anything considered dangerous even in a small reaction to ensure his students and postdocs would know what to expect.

Permalink to Comment

18. bearing on January 23, 2009 2:26 PM writes...

Another thing that might help, as silly and as superficial as it may sound, is a curtain around the safety shower.

I have worked in two environments -- one student organic chemistry lab, and one chemical plant -- where individuals were injured because, their clothing soaked by a chemical spill, they lost valuable seconds and minutes to go somewhere they could remove the clothing in privacy.

One was a male student who went down the hall to the bathroom to remove his jeans after spilling concentrated sulfuric acid on himself, the other was a female technician who got sprayed over her entire body -- I don't remember the chemical, sorry, but she spent time in the hospital afterward. In both cases there was a shower literally steps away.

Human nature won't change, and "strip naked in front of a mixed group of co-workers" will always be something people are resistant to do.

Permalink to Comment

19. training on January 23, 2009 2:37 PM writes...

Under no circurstance, Should the PI allow (encourage?) a fresh graduate student to conduct such a reaction without proper training.

Even worse, the PI should not encourage (force?) graduate student to work during the holiday without adequate supervision.

Folks, we all know the reality in graduate school.
Instead of sitting here talking about "chemistry", let's do something the help those innocent young kids. Let's dig out the deep reasons behind this kinds of accidents.

God bless chemists.

Permalink to Comment

20. nitric oxide 99 on January 23, 2009 2:48 PM writes...

This post has got me thinking about something I'm planning in the coming week - a Strecker-like reaction requiring about 100 mmol of HCN. The original German paper I'm following calls for addition of "wasserfreie Blausaure" - pure HCN (which I guess is blue colored in liquid form?).

I'm hoping I can get away with generating the HCN in situ by addition of AcOH to KCN.

Obviously I'll be working in the hood with sash down and flushing thoroughly with N2 after the reaction's complete. Anything else I should consider to stay safe?

Permalink to Comment

21. MikeEast on January 23, 2009 3:01 PM writes...

My heart sank reading this post. Probably because as a 22-year-old chemist I also did not comprehend the potential dangers in all of the bottles and jars around me.

There but for the grace of God go I.

Permalink to Comment

22. pharmaresearcher on January 23, 2009 3:32 PM writes...

I would suggest cannulating pyrophorics into a septumed graduated cylinder when dealing with large volumes then recannulating into the reaction there is little hand strength involved and if the cannula clogs you don't have to worry about alot of BuLi you can't quench.

Permalink to Comment

23. Me on January 23, 2009 3:41 PM writes...

t-Butyl Lithium is less dangerous than trimethyl-Aluminum.

Permalink to Comment

24. Swapna on January 23, 2009 3:43 PM writes...

Heard about this through a colleague. Tragic indeed. It's almost "mandatory" for graduate students to work on weekends and holidays here, but none of us ever does it alone. There's at least one other person in the same lab. or the next.

I always set up any reaction involving alkyllithiums on weekdays when the response time from folks around will be reasonably higher if I screamed bloody murder.

More importantly, proper training is key, be it by the PI or a senior graduate student/post-doc. Setting a good example for the young'uns has to exist.

Derek, you really touched upon an important point there with learning to recognize the potential hazards associated with conducting any reaction. If you run through the drill before you start the reaction, it is indeed true that the response to an accident is better and well-judged.


Permalink to Comment

25. jkp on January 23, 2009 3:47 PM writes...


NotVodoo has an attempt at practical "peer reviewed" safety precautions (see Reagents). Their idea could definitely use some refining, but I think it's a step in the right direction.

Permalink to Comment

26. Sili on January 23, 2009 3:56 PM writes...

"wasserfreie Blausaure" - pure HCN (which I guess is blue colored in liquid form?).
No. It's called "Blausäure", because it was first synthesised from "Berlinerblau" - Prussian blue.

And yet again I realise that I'll never get to work as a chemist. I really did waste my years at uni, not picking up any good lab habits.

Permalink to Comment

27. Hap on January 23, 2009 4:22 PM writes...

I assume most places have mandatory safety training for working with HCN - where I was at undergrad, training was mandatory if you intended to work with fluorine, nickel tetracarbonyl, hydrogen cyanide, and one other (that I can't remember). There's kits for immediate treatment of HCN toxicity as well (before you go to the hospital) as well. I think anhydrous HCN also has other hazards (it likes to polymerize, I think).

Is there another way to do your reaction, not involving a couple of grams of concd. HCN?

Permalink to Comment

28. InfMP on January 23, 2009 4:31 PM writes...

Well, to elaborate on the TMSCHN2 story, it happened in the province in canada where i am from...
A worker at a pharm company in windsor died in the hospital long after the work day was done. His lungs were dissolving and he told people the chemical he was working with. So much for the "safe" CH2N2
CBC reported the story if you google. (they are like ABC or CBS in Canada).

Permalink to Comment

29. Mass on January 23, 2009 5:38 PM writes...

Regarding HCN alternative: Use acetone hydrin as an alternative to HCN.

Regarding plastic syringe: You do not have to deal with the clogged ones ...You can dispose them of. Does any one know which make is good and inexpensive? I have decided to shift to them for good.

Permalink to Comment

30. milkshake on January 23, 2009 7:00 PM writes...

Strecker: I used to do a 30-gram-scale Strecker by adding solid zinc cyanide into ice-cooled mixture of my aniline and N-alkyl piperidone in 80% acetic acid. It worked very well and the HCN release was negligible.

I also did a variant of Strecker by mixing the cyanohydrine of my ketone with an excess (4 equivs) of morpholine and heating the mix to 60C for few hours.

Permalink to Comment

31. S on January 23, 2009 8:13 PM writes...

This is really strange... I'm an undergrad, just started working in a research lab today. I read this article before going into lab, and was told that I would be using trimethylsilyldiazomethane in my first reaction... I didn't put it together that this was the same compound. Strange. And kind of creepy.

Permalink to Comment

32. DLIB on January 23, 2009 9:22 PM writes...

bearing: Not a silly idea at all...

I know a lady who has burns all over her legs from Piranha because she was to embarrassed to get into the safety shower. They now have curtains

Permalink to Comment

33. Chemist of Sorts on January 23, 2009 9:32 PM writes...

Tragic but unfortunately a result of academic culture. Most grad students are trained by senior students/post docs who don't always take care to do it right. They often have other things to do and, anyway, the atmosphere is that you learn as you go along. In my experience, academic advisors have minimal contact with students in regard to technique.

The majority of the responsibility for this has to lie with the PI. Safety is the most important aspect of lab life. As a PI myself (industrial), I will not allow anybody working for me to do anything that I don't feel confident they can do safely and correctly. If this means that I add a reagent to an associate's reaction while they watch, so be it. I have done this in the past and would do it again if I have any misgivings about someone's experience and skill. PIs must be aware of whats going on in their labs, and adjust accordingly. Anything less is negligence.

Permalink to Comment

34. Chemjobber on January 23, 2009 10:15 PM writes...

@Nitric: I like Milkshake's suggestion the best, but if you want to read an interesting view of HCN from Derek himself, here's the link:

Permalink to Comment

35. frozenraisin on January 23, 2009 10:16 PM writes...

With regards to using HCN, I think the following should be considered a necessity:

1) A functioning HCN detector
2) A coworker nearby (but not too nearby) who is familiar with the HCN detox procedure including the adrenaline injection
3) A clean air line for breathing should be available in an industrial setting, e.g. kilo lab.

Also keep in mind that the first symptoms of HCN poisoning is identical to a panic attack.

Permalink to Comment

36. BCP on January 23, 2009 11:41 PM writes...

Another vote for using cannulation for tBuLi. Big syringes are a no-no.

Permalink to Comment

37. Krillin on January 24, 2009 12:46 AM writes...

When I worked at a military lab, lab coats were only worn during visits from the brass. Actually working in them would incur the risk of getting them dirty and causing the lab to fail a cleanliness inspection.

Permalink to Comment

38. processchemist on January 24, 2009 3:53 AM writes...

I have, helas, a wide experience with t-butyl lithium on bench - Kg scale. I think that low pressure cylinders you use with reactors are much safer than bottles with septa - IF USED BY WELL TRAINED OPERATORS - and so 5 or 20 Kg of t-BuLi are "safer" than 320 ml.
For small quantities my preference goes to glass syringes up to 20 ml. Also cannulation of multiple bottles, with t-BuLi, has safety problems (when you change bottle).
Obviously you must be sure of the absence of overpressure in the bottle - this is the safest way to deal with it. To use plastic syringes with a tight plug, in my opinion, is not so safe: you can have an excessive pressure in the bottle without being aware of it.

For beginnes aldrich tec bull about air sensitive rectives is one of the best documents I've seen around.

Strecker: I'm dealing currently with some. I see that work up, more than reaction, has safety issues. Working on the 10-50g scale with a 10% excess of cyanide without a tight pH control it's not advisable.

Permalink to Comment

39. lassa on January 24, 2009 10:07 AM writes...

Thought I'd throw in my two pence having done a number of multigram scale Streckers. I found the best way to generate the HCN was using a stock aqueous solution of KCN (easily handled solid), and stock solution of acid (I think I was using HOAc at the time). I never observed any gases, never smelled any almonds, and after a basic workup everything went to the toxic waste people, no problems.

As far as the t-BuLi use, I never liked cannulation. Too often I've seen people with plugged cannulas just keep upping the pressure on the bottle/flask they're pushing out of. I always think it looks like an incident waiting to happen. Count this as another vote for *threaded* 20 mL disposable syringes. (Never try to reuse one either, as they always seem to leak on the 2nd try.) Use as many as it takes to get where you're going.

Condolences to anyone who's been injured, or lost someone due to this kind of incident. Truly regrettable.

Permalink to Comment

40. Lab Coats on January 24, 2009 10:33 AM writes...

What is the current consensus on the preferred material for lab coats: 100% cotton or cotton/polyester blend? I would prefer 100% cotton because it will not melt like synthetics, but they are hard to find.

Permalink to Comment

41. Retread on January 24, 2009 2:18 PM writes...

Always tragic to see a young life terminated, particularly when from something preventable. As an M. D. I saw plenty -- drug overdoses, alcohol related automobile accidents, barroom fights, AIDS etc. etc.

This brings up the following poinst. You all know how to behave safely in a lab. What out of the lab risky behavior do you indulge in? How many of you smoke, how many drink to excess, use narcotics, cocaine etc. etc. Time to reflect on what happened and stop doing these things.

Permalink to Comment

42. Anonymous on January 24, 2009 2:43 PM writes...

is it just me or is "Retread" a total douche?

Permalink to Comment

43. AliG on January 24, 2009 4:41 PM writes...

I once needed to use HCN on decent scale. I found it convenient to prepare a solution of it by dripping sulfuric acid onto NaCN and condesening into a solvent of choice (toluene for me). You can preweigh a flask with solvent in it and condense the HCN into the solution cooled in a dry-ice bath. Afterwards, you re-weigh the flask and you know the concentration of HCN. You never have to deal with pure liquid HCN. Also you can buy cyanide antidote kits, but someone with medical training will have to order it.

Permalink to Comment

44. The Inorganic Gardener on January 24, 2009 7:27 PM writes...

Alas in the UK, the cyanide antidote kits are becoming a thing of the past. I work with cyanide regularly (cyanoloysis of higher polythionates) and even though I get through kgs of KCN a month, I've never let myself get blasé about the stuff. Always supercareful and very strict with myself about procedure etc. The antidote kits are, as far as my departmental H&S guy is aware, no longer recommended in the UK due to the number of misadministrations etc which have caused more harm than good. The only thing we have an antidote kit for is diisopropylfluorophosphate - one to avoid if you can help it!

Permalink to Comment

45. milkshake on January 24, 2009 11:05 PM writes...

Young synthetic chemist's life is not tragically terminated - its "quenched prematurely" .

HCN generation: For small-scale reactions it is better to use TMSCN (with gloves) in the presence of 1.2 equivs of isopropanol or methanol at OC, it desylilates promptly even at low tempetature.

TMSCN is somewhat expensive though, and just as toxic on molar basis if you spill it on yourself or ingest it.

Cyanide aantidote is not adrenaline injection as mentioned here (someone must have watched too much Pulp Fiction lately) but n-amyl nitrite "poppers".
Amyl nitrite does not work too well though and a better antidote is an IV injection of a sub-lethal dose of sodium nitrite, about 300mg, followed by injection of several grams of sodium thiosulfite.

Obviously you don't want to improvise this risky IV antidote rescue in the lab (there are commercial antidote kits available) but having some volatile nitrite at hand is probably a good idea when working with a source of HCN. The downside is that the nitrite inhalation by itself can make you feel pretty sick for the rest of the day as I have once found out during a careless work with TMSCN

Permalink to Comment

46. Krillin on January 24, 2009 11:47 PM writes...

Some day we'll have a cyanide antidote that works prophylactically.

Permalink to Comment

47. Halogen Exchanger on January 25, 2009 5:27 PM writes...

I use t-BuLi almost every other week. The air-conditioning in my lab is so damned good -- I mean, in Houston Texas! -- that I have never seen a single flame, at least so far, coming out of the drops of t-BuLi solution I sometimes spilled in my hood. I found even a 30 mL plastic syringe is somewhat too tight for the situation. And a 18 gauge needle is always recommended since you can get into trouble when trying to poke a 20 gauge through the SureSeal. I once use a 20 gauge for tBuLi, and it broke when I was trying hard to poke it through. I immediately pulled it out with no accident.

And in addition, dry ice is always good for quenching your butyllithiums. If the tBuLi does spill, why not make some pivalic acid out of it? =]

Permalink to Comment

48. a chemist on January 26, 2009 8:26 AM writes...

No time to read ALL of the posts, but:

1. Best source of REAL info on reactive hazards is Bretherick's Handbook of Reactive Chemical Hazards (7th Ed = current). Good indexes; detailed reports or real research lab incidents, not something happening in a refinery or tank truck.

2. When I quench reactives such as RLi, Na(O), K(O), etc., I do NOT start with an alcohol (iPrOH or even tBuOH), I start with something like ethyl acetate: less reactive, reacts by addition (RLi), not formation of flammable RH; EtOAc (diluted in an inert co-solvent) consumes the reducing metals via a slow acyloin condensation. I never compared EtOAc to other esters because none of my quenches ever got out of hand. I suppose pivalate or benzoate might also work.

Permalink to Comment

49. Duke of Prunes on January 26, 2009 9:46 AM writes...

no anonymous, it's you. why don't you go someplace else and cast aspersions.

Permalink to Comment

50. RB Woodweird on January 27, 2009 7:59 AM writes...

Just remember to keep a lit cigarette in your mouth when working with cyanide and you will be okay.

Permalink to Comment

51. Sohan Jindal on January 28, 2009 8:08 AM writes...

After reading this, I recollected the accident in a very simple experiment I was conducting involving benzene removal by distillation. The rceiver(250 ml) to collect the distillate was smaller then the distillation flask(1 l). It got full. When I tried to change it the solvent spilled on my hands, clothes & in the hood. Electrical heater ignited the solvent. My hands caught fire & I tried to extinguish the flames by rubbing on my clothes, which caught fire being made of polyetster. My colleagues looked for a blanket to help me, but could not find one. I ran out from the laboratory and rolled on the floor to extingush the fire. My instructor took me to another building and put me under cold shower. Thanks to him I learnt what to do in an emergency fire.

Permalink to Comment

52. CPI guy on January 28, 2009 4:57 PM writes...

Best advice I ever received from my Ph.D. supervisor: "Work With The Molecule. Don't Fight It." Translated to the molecular level, this means that anything the requires excessive force (one could include reagents like t-Buli) are bound to cause trouble with decomposition, poor yields, regio- and stereosloppiness of products etc.

Best advice I received from my best boss ever: "Always buy your bonds if you can, rather than making them." $500 for 5 g of a key intermediate? If you can make it in a day, safely and with minimal hassle -- make it. But your labor probably costs the company between $500 and $1000 per day -- even more if you sustain injuries. Do the math.

In labs that I have supervised there are certain no-no reactions and reagents that will not be performed/used respectively -- no argument, no question. No t-BuLi or sec-Buli. If you can't do it with n-Buli or LHDMS etc. -- find another way. No diazomethane. Find another way to make a methyl ester. No methanol solvents for Pd catalyzed hydrogenolyses/reductions. Even if it's following a literature procedure. Find Another Solvent! (Ethanol's just fine...)

Permalink to Comment

53. zts on January 28, 2009 6:29 PM writes...

CPI guy said: "In labs that I have supervised there are certain no-no reactions and reagents that will not be performed/used respectively -- no argument, no question. No t-BuLi or sec-Buli. If you can't do it with n-Buli or LHDMS etc. -- find another way."

There are some reagents that I wouldn't want to work with, but your list seems awfully restrictive. For things like t-BuLi, CH2N2, if you understand the risks and take appropriate precautions (scale, PPE, know the emergency procedures, etc.), there shouldn't be a problem. People do need to understand and respect the dangers of certain reagents, but that shouldn't stop you from using them if they are necessary.

I've used a lot of t-BuLi. With syringes I always point the plungers away from me, so if they pop out any chemicals should only just get my glove (for something like t-BuLi I'd wear heavier gloves, which are also easier to slip off, although I've never personally had a problem). Very rarely (once or twice) I've had reagents squirt up past the plunger as I've pushed it down (if something caused excessive warping on a disposable syringe)). If I am on larger scale with t-BuLi, or any other flammable reagent, I cannulate (bottle clamped to monkey bars so it won't fall over, etc). A clogged cannula is easy to quench because there is so little reagent in it, and a small flame out the end of a cannula shouldn't be a problem.

A lot of this does require significant mentoring so you can build enough intuition about the right way to work with certain potentially dangerous things. If I don't know how a reagent behaves, I usually pull up just a couple of drops and squirt them into my hood (with no flammables around). Little fires burn themselves right out, and now you know what to expect and how cautious you should be and hopefully won't panic if something goes wrong.

Permalink to Comment

54. Linda on February 4, 2009 2:19 PM writes...

Any more hints about the suggested trimethylsilyl diazomethane fatality? (And thanks Derek; your thoughts and prose are a good rea, good info.)

Permalink to Comment

55. GCLJ on February 9, 2009 9:39 AM writes...

For the generation of diazomethane from trimethylsilyl diazomethane: see Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2007, 46, 7075

Permalink to Comment

56. Jillian on February 10, 2009 3:01 PM writes...

Linda who wrote a comment on February 4th under # 54 - What kind of information are you looking for?

Permalink to Comment

57. Fentonh on February 19, 2009 10:00 PM writes...

To the user working with "wasserfreier Blausäure":

(a) keep bleach close at hand to destroy aq. HCN
(b) get a _fresh_ ampoule of the antidote at hand (just in case). Inform yourself about the different types that are available.
(c) consider working with the stuff under a dry ice/acetone cold finger
(d) of course you have someone else close at hand.

BTW, Blausäure gets its name from Fe(CN)6 (3-), from which HCN was originally isolated. Fe(CN)6 (3-) has light blue color.

Permalink to Comment

58. Concerned Chemist on February 25, 2009 12:10 AM writes...

I think there is value in clarifying the details of the diazomethane portion of this storey. It seems that this storey is related to in incident at Sepracor in Windsor NS. According to CBC reports, the unfortunate death arose from exposure to D-malic acid, not diazomethane, as the victim's family has suggested in a local paper. While diazomethane should certainly be handled with appropriate caution, I think it would be helpful to have clarification on the facts of this storey.

Permalink to Comment

59. milkshake on February 26, 2009 8:57 PM writes...

The malic acid in the story is a red herring, the guy worked with number of chemicals that day, and felt fine when he left for home but developed cough and flu-like chills after few hours which then proceeded into full-blown lung oedema and he died in hospital next day due-to flooded lungs. The patient was conscious and communicated with doctors for most of his ordeal, and of course he named all substances he worked with that day. The toxicologists probably focused on malic acid initially and named it as a likely cause because it is "acid" and they could find tox data on it easily. (While they were unfamiliar with diazo compounds). But from all stuff he named it it was most likely TMS-diazomethane.

There was a guy in Prague Institute of Organic Chemistry who ended up on intensive care unit with lung oedema because of his careless preparation of diazomethane. The work-injury report from the hospital had stated as a probable cause "Poisoned with diazometals" (sic)

Permalink to Comment

60. Chemjobber on March 3, 2009 8:04 AM writes...

I've put some of my further thoughts on the UCLA incident at the link below, reaction to the recent LA Times article on the accident:

Permalink to Comment

61. mike davis on March 30, 2009 2:10 PM writes...

I find this discussion a bit worrying. Where I work technical staff has been reduced "to a minimum", so general advice from people with experience is in short supply.
I do not think the problem was with t-butyllithium, the quantity was to small, it was with the fire from flammable solvent and lack off prior information and support.
Chemicals are supplied in safer packaging these days but when you use them the risks are still the same.


Permalink to Comment

62. LB on September 25, 2011 5:44 AM writes...

Undoubtedly, I am a little late to the conversation here. But I enjoyed reading through all the experiences. It's good to absorb all sorts of wisdom from synthetic chemists, being a first year graduate.

There is one thing I'd like to clarify, though. Why did someone advise not use methanol in a Pd catalysed reduction? I have been, and will be again, employing methanol as my solvent in the reduction of an intermediate, using a hydrogen balloon at ambient temperature. So far this has been carried out without any issue, and to date, I have not been made aware of any specific hazards surrounding this. Is the person simply referring to the toxicity associated with methanol?

Permalink to Comment

63. LB on September 25, 2011 5:46 AM writes...

Undoubtedly, I am a little late to the conversation here. But I enjoyed reading through all the experiences. It's good to absorb all sorts of wisdom from synthetic chemists, being a first year graduate.

There is one thing I'd like to clarify, though. Why did someone advise not use methanol in a Pd catalysed reduction? I have been, and will be again, employing methanol as my solvent in the reduction of an intermediate, using a hydrogen balloon at ambient temperature. So far this has been carried out without any issue, and to date, I have not been made aware of any specific hazards surrounding this. Is the person simply referring to the toxicity associated with methanol?

Permalink to Comment

64. AST on September 30, 2011 12:49 PM writes...

LB: The issue with methanol and Pd/C is that Pd/C has a tendency to catch on fire in air and methanol is more flammable than EtOH.

Permalink to Comment

65. spikes on December 21, 2011 10:57 AM writes...

It is a indisputable fact that a marketing campaign has to be witnessed personal training for you to seven days well before an individual to expect to take action.

Permalink to Comment


Remember Me?


Email this entry to:

Your email address:

Message (optional):

The Last Post
The GSK Layoffs Continue, By Proxy
The Move is Nigh
Another Alzheimer's IPO
Cutbacks at C&E News
Sanofi Pays to Get Back Into Oncology
An Irresponsible Statement About Curing Cancer
Oliver Sacks on Turning Back to Chemistry