Corante

About this Author
Derek Lowe
Derek Lowe, an Arkansan by birth, got his BA from Hendrix College and his PhD in organic chemistry from Duke before spending time in Germany on a Humboldt Fellowship on his post-doc. He's worked for several major pharmaceutical companies since 1989 on drug discovery projects against schizophrenia, Alzheimer's, diabetes, osteoporosis and other diseases. To contact Derek email him directly: derekb.lowe@gmail.com Twitter: Dereklowe

Chemistry and Drug Data: Drugbank
Emolecules
ChemSpider
PubChem
DailyMed
Druglib
Clinicaltrials.gov
Chemistry and Pharma Blogs:
The Science Business
Org Prep Daily
Kilomentor
On Pharma
Kinase Pro
Pharma Conduct
Chemical Quantum Images
The LouRoe
One in Ten Thousand
Periodic Tabloid
Chemical Musings
C&E News Blog
Chemiotics II
Chemical Space
Noel O'Blog
In Vivo Blog
Chirality

BBSRC/Douglas Kell
Drug Discovery Opinion
The Chemblog
Realizations in Biostatistics
Molecule of the Day
Chemjobber
Pharmalot
WSJ Health Blog
Chemical Crystallinity
ChemSpider Blog
Pharmagossip
Med-Chemist
Organometallic Current
Useful Chemistry
Chiral Jones
Great Molecular Crapshoot
No Name No Slogan
SimBioSys
Culture of Chemistry
The Curious Wavefunction
Chemical Sabbatical
Totally Synthetic
Zusammen
My Chemical Journey
The F- Blog
Generally Chemistry
Chemistry World Blog
Synthetic Nature
Synthesizing Ideas
Carbon-Based Curiosities
Business|Bytes|Genes|Molecules
Eye on FDA
Sigma-Aldrich ChemBlogs
Chemical Forums
Depth-First
P212121
Curly Arrow
ChemCafe
Power of Goo
Fetz the Chemist
Sceptical Chymist
Lamentations on Chemistry
Computational Organic Chemistry
Mining Drugs
Henry Rzepa
Pharma Blog Review


Science Blogs and News:
The Loom
Uncertain Principles
Fierce Biotech
Blogs for Industry
Omics! Omics!
Young Female Scientist
Notional Slurry
Life of a Lab Rat
Nobel Intent
SciTech Daily
Is This Thing On?
Science Blog
Eastern Blot
FuturePundit
Flags and Lollipops
Aetiology
Gene Expression (I)
Gene Expression (II)
Sciencebase
Pharyngula
Adventures in Ethics and Science
Terra Sigillata
Transterrestrial Musings
Slashdot Science
A Scientist's Life
Living the Scientific Life
Humans in Science
Speculist
Science, Shrimp and Grits
Cosmic Variance
The Capsule
Zeroth Order Approximation
Science Library Blog
Biology News Net


Medical Blogs
Med Tech Sentinel
DB's Medical Rants
Science-Based Medicine
GruntDoc
The Health Care Blog
Respectful Insolence
Black Triangle
Diabetes Mine


Economics and Business
Marginal Revolution
Arnold Kling
The Volokh Conspiracy
Knowledge Problem
The Stalwart


Politics / Current Events
Virginia Postrel
Tinkerty Tonk
Instapundit
Megan McArdle
Mickey Kaus
Colby Cosh
Alien Corn
No Watermelons


Belles Lettres
Two Blowhards
Critical Mass
Arts and Letters Daily
God of the Machine
Armavirumque
About Last Night
In the Pipeline: Don't miss Derek Lowe's excellent commentary on drug discovery and the pharma industry in general at In the Pipeline

In the Pipeline

« Mutual Suspicions | Main | Outside Reading »

August 23, 2005

Gritting Our Teeth

Email This Entry

Posted by Derek

I'll tell you a company that's been watching what's happened to Merck and thinking hard about it: Sanofi. Well, OK, everyone in the industry has been looking at Merck's situation and shuddering, but I suspect the people at Sanofi(-Aventis) are especially jumpy. Why? Rimonabant.

Rimonabant, which will come to the market next year (most likely) under the name Acomplia, is one everyone's short list of potential multibillion dollar drugs. It'll be the first new drug treatment for obesity in years, and it's the first one ever with its mechanism of action (antagonism of the CB(1) receptor). It has potential for many sorts of addiction therapy as well. Although there's room to argue about just how effective it is compared to existing therapies, and there's some concern about how many HMOs will pay for it, there's little doubt that it's going to sell like crazy.

And there's the worry. There is absolutely no way that large enough clinical trials could be run on a drug like this to predict everything that might happen when millions of people start taking it. Can't be done. You can get down to a margin of safety that will get you past the FDA, but that isn't enough, now is it? No, if one person out of a hundred thousand has a nasty side effect, that's enough to bring the sky down on your head. And we can't test down to the level of one-per-hundred-thousand effects.

A fine situation, isn't it? This same argument applies to every new drug, naturally, but especially to a groundbreaking compound like rimonabant. That's just what we needed, an incentive not to be first in class with a new drug. What, exactly, are we doing to ourselves?

Comments (3) + TrackBacks (0) | Category: "Me Too" Drugs | Clinical Trials | Diabetes and Obesity


COMMENTS

1. tombartlett7 on August 24, 2005 6:21 AM writes...

Tell me about it. I work for a start-up. Management has had the devil of a time scoring VC money to keep us together in these post-".com" days. Now, the VC's can be further spooked by frivolous mega-lawsuits, like the Vioxx cases. I wouldn't completely blame them if they put their money on some kind of short time-t0-market fluff like a Google or Napster clone instead.

Permalink to Comment

2. casey451 on August 24, 2005 5:48 PM writes...

A company that everybody in the industry SHOULD be watching is Elan. They pulled their very promising MS drug immediately after 2 test subjects died from a rare brain disorder. So far, no further deaths, no evidence the drug caused the disorder, and, unlike Merck, no indication Elan hid any negative test results. Elan apparently learned to be upfront about all things after their former executives were caught playing games in the accounting department. Its drug appears to be headed back to the marketplace with some warnings, an outcome that seems appropriate to me. And I own the stock, and took a very significant hit when they pulled the drug.

So far Sanofi seems to be doing things right on behalf of ITS very promising drug, Rimonabant. It's the FDA that could stomp on it by pretending it is possible to test enough people to avoid nasty side effects. After all, the FDA has to make up for Vioxx, and Rimonabant seems the perfect victim for the reasons you cite above.

Permalink to Comment

3. Tom Bartlett on August 25, 2005 4:05 PM writes...

I have some ELN, too-- not tons, but some. I think their Alzheimers work has promise. I'd like to see them crawl back up to $60, but maybe I'm deluded....

Permalink to Comment


EMAIL THIS ENTRY TO A FRIEND

Email this entry to:

Your email address:

Message (optional):




RELATED ENTRIES
Dealing With Hedgehog Screening Results
Animal Rights, You Say?
Blogroll Update
Pharma's Return on Investment: Yikes
How A Real Drug Industry Project Meeting Goes
Ghostwriting
Just Give It to NIH
How Not To Do It: The Secret Patent Decoder Ring