« Waiting for the FDA |
Main
| Can Med-Chem Help With Bird Flu? »
February 20, 2005
COX-2 Aftermath
Posted by Derek
Overall, I found the conclusionsn of the FDA's COX-2 committee quite reasonable (and not too far from what I predicted during the day on Friday.) Perhaps their actions will calm things down a bit. After all, they had the chance to bay at the moon, yank everything off the market and call for heads on pikes. But they ended up saying (I'm paraphrasing just a bit): "Y'know, these drugs really do have side effects. But a lot of stuff does. And they do some people some good. Maybe if just the people who really need them take them, things will work themselves out."
This all should make Merck's path forward in their Vioxx lawsuits a little easier. They could still face a punitive-damages avalanche, of course, and a lot of lawyers will be working to get the snowpack loosened up. I assume that the first case will be tried in Mississippi, Texas, or some other jury award paradise - picking the right venue is part of the art.
I'm just glad that the "Toxic drugs! Film at eleven!" momentum has been lost. I think that the industry, the stock market, the public, and (most definitely) the press were really close to panic there for a bit. (Naturally enough, in the last case, since panic sells.) But outside of advertising revenue, it does no one any good. If you make the right decision in that frame of mind, it's generally by accident.
Comments (2)
+ TrackBacks (0) | Category: Cardiovascular Disease
- RELATED ENTRIES
- Shire's Replagal Problems: An Inside Look?
- Bungled Structure, And How
- Roche Closes Nutley, Once Its US R&D Home
- The Next Five Years in the Drug Industry
- A Kinase Inhibitor Learns Something New
- The Good Ol' Friedel-Crafts
- Merck's Madagascar Marketing Mess
- Scientific Literacy: Where Do You Stop?
1. John Thacker on February 21, 2005 1:27 PM writes...
"I assume that the first case will be tried in Mississippi, Texas, or some other jury award paradise - picking the right venue is part of the art."
Possibly not. The recently passed and signed Class Action Fairness Act curtails venue shopping by quite a lot. Basically it removes to federal court class action lawsuits which consist of people in several states suing over behavior in several states. No longer can people forum shop by having one named member of the class being from the named state.
Permalink to Comment2. John Wurzelmann on February 22, 2005 10:44 AM writes...
In a somewhat related aside, Why is it that the public or industry professionals have to pay for electronic access to advisory meetings such as just took place? It seems to me at the least that an audio feed, either live streaming or off-line format (MP3) should be available at the FDA or elsewhere. After all the FDA is supported by Tax payer money. Let's hear it for transparency in government. Perhaps the blogosphere, with its legendary political clout, can start a groundswell of enthusiasm for democratic reform of this public forum. I know transcripts will eventually be available, but I'd rather listen at my computer while otherwise multi-tasking.
John W
Permalink to Comment