Corante

About this Author
Derek Lowe
Derek Lowe, an Arkansan by birth, got his BA from Hendrix College and his PhD in organic chemistry from Duke before spending time in Germany on a Humboldt Fellowship on his post-doc. He's worked for several major pharmaceutical companies since 1989 on drug discovery projects against schizophrenia, Alzheimer's, diabetes, osteoporosis and other diseases. To contact Derek email him directly: derekb.lowe@gmail.com Twitter: Dereklowe

Chemistry and Drug Data: Drugbank
Emolecules
ChemSpider
Chempedia Lab
Synthetic Pages
Organic Chemistry Portal
PubChem
Not Voodoo
DailyMed
Druglib
Clinicaltrials.gov

Chemistry and Pharma Blogs:
Org Prep Daily
The Haystack
MedChem Buzz
Kilomentor
On Pharma
A New Merck, Reviewed
Liberal Arts Chemistry
One in Ten Thousand
Electron Pusher
Periodic Tabloid
All Things Metathesis
C&E News Blog
Propter Doc
Chemiotics II
The Chemical Notebook
Chemical Space
Noel O'Blog
In Vivo Blog
Terra Sigilatta
Chirality
BBSRC/Douglas Kell
ChemBark
Drug Discovery Opinion
Realizations in Biostatistics
Chemjobber
Pharmalot
WSJ Health Blog
ChemSpider Blog
Pharmagossip
Med-Chemist
Organic Chem - Education & Industry
Useful Chemistry
Chiral Jones
Pharma Strategy Blog
No Name No Slogan
Practical Fragments
SimBioSys
The Curious Wavefunction
Natural Product Man
Totally Synthetic
Fragment Literature
The F- Blog
Chemistry World Blog
Synthetic Nature
Chemistry Blog
Synthesizing Ideas
Carbon-Based Curiosities
Experimental Error
Business|Bytes|Genes|Molecules
Eye on FDA
Sigma-Aldrich ChemBlogs
Chemical Forums
Depth-First
Symyx Blog
P212121
ChemCafe
Sceptical Chymist
Lamentations on Chemistry
Computational Organic Chemistry
Mining Drugs
Henry Rzepa


Science Blogs and News:
Bad Science
The Loom
Uncertain Principles
Fierce Biotech
Blogs for Industry
Omics! Omics!
Young Female Scientist
Notional Slurry
Nobel Intent
SciTech Daily
Science Blog
FuturePundit
Aetiology
Gene Expression (I)
Gene Expression (II)
Sciencebase
Pharyngula
Adventures in Ethics and Science
Transterrestrial Musings
Slashdot Science
A Scientist's Life
Speculist
Cosmic Variance
The Capsule
Zeroth Order Approximation
Biology News Net


Medical Blogs
Med Tech Sentinel
DB's Medical Rants
Science-Based Medicine
GruntDoc
The Health Care Blog
Respectful Insolence
Black Triangle
Diabetes Mine


Economics and Business
Marginal Revolution
Arnold Kling
The Volokh Conspiracy
Knowledge Problem
The Stalwart


Politics / Current Events
Virginia Postrel
Tinkerty Tonk
Instapundit
Megan McArdle
Mickey Kaus
Colby Cosh
Alien Corn
No Watermelons


Belles Lettres
Two Blowhards
Critical Mass
Arts and Letters Daily
God of the Machine
Armavirumque
About Last Night
In the Pipeline: Don't miss Derek Lowe's excellent commentary on drug discovery and the pharma industry in general at In the Pipeline

In the Pipeline

« Chemistry Geekery | Main | Archaeologists Announce Dirty Laundry Discovery »

November 28, 2004

Some Perspective

Email This Entry

Posted by Derek

I remember when this year started that I said that no one in the industry was going to miss 2003, but I think that a lot of folks would trade in 2004 to have it back. I'm pretty easygoing, but man, this has been one of the worst stretches for the drug business that anyone can recall. Every week brings more news of layoffs, regulatory troubles, lawsuits and investigations. We have a front-row seat for the long-running show titled One Damn Thing After Another, and the intermission is not yet in sight.

I won't bother to link to all the individual stories - just go to any news site and enter in the name of a drug company. Odds are the first story that comes up will be negative. It's quite a sight.

But it's important to keep some perspective, even as another load of subpoenas and rotten tomatoes comes in over the transom. The drug industry isn't going away. We perform a vital service, and it's just going to get more important with time. We, our current customers, even the same people who are howling for our heads now will need medicines. And (for many years to come) we - for all our faults - will be the only people who even have a hope of delivering them. We just have to hold on, and hope that all this is a period of creative destruction, rather than the standard bulk-rate kind.

Comments (3) + TrackBacks (0) | Category: Drug Industry History


COMMENTS

1. jeet on November 29, 2004 5:37 PM writes...

of course as an industry insider, I'm (almost by definition) bullish on the impact of pharma and device manufacturers on the long-term health of the population. But here are some of the high impact areas that had a great 2004



1. Humanized monoclonal antibodies - although oral, small molecules are the goal; there are a lot of humanized MAbs in the clinic and a lot more to come. With the current generation of technology (see Abgenix) the development time has been shortened and manufacturing has become almost routine.



2. Cancer therapies - there has been a big shift from general chemotherapies to more targeted drugs. These molecules, combined with a number of big cancer trials that are now/ will be shortly publishing data are giving doctors a new range of treatment options.



3. Implantable defibrillators - big news, the impact of these devices on NYHA Class II patients is real and now they are covered by Medicare. Expect to see some big shifts in life expectancy for heart failure patients (SCD-HeFT trial)



What's going to have major impact in the next 3-5 years?



1. Biogenerics - no regulatory path available in the US, but one is being developed in the EU. Will have a major impact on the cost of certain therapies (i.e., Epogen)



2. Molecular cancer diagnostics - most cancers can be treated if they are diagnosed in Stage I or II. Of course, the bad news is that most cancers are diagnosed in stages II and III - right before or at metastatic disease. With molecular diagnostics it will be possible to diagnose and then confirm and treat at Stage I and II.

Permalink to Comment

2. Peter on November 29, 2004 9:50 PM writes...

2004 has definitely been a challenging one for those of use in big pharma. Much of the stigma results from the fact that the benefit comes from the poor health of those who purchase the medicines.

We walk a tightrope in which too much profit makes us appear to benefit from the sick, while too much charity makes the business and ultimately research suffer. We need to take a step in the direction of showing compassion on the sick and showing what good we can do. The pharmaceutical industry needs to give itself a makeover. We need to show who we have helped and who we will help.

Look at the Bristol-Myers Squibb Lance Armstrong commercial in which he tells about a cancer drugs that saved his life. Brilliant. Think about all the spokespersons who have been helped by arthritis drugs, heart medication, cancer medication, reflux inhibitors, cholesterol lowering drugs, antibiotics, and others.

Permalink to Comment

3. tree on December 5, 2004 7:43 PM writes...

This industry lost itself to profit. Every decision made was business decision in every company. Employee are robots, have no creativity, and very little interest in science.

Permalink to Comment


EMAIL THIS ENTRY TO A FRIEND

Email this entry to:

Your email address:

Message (optional):




RELATED ENTRIES
Academia and Industry, Suing Each Other
Let's Start Off the Meeting With An Ad, OK?
The Academic-Industrial Collaboration in Drug Discovery Panel: Today
Glass Structure, Atom by Atom
How the Andrulis Paper Got Published
AstraZeneca in Waltham
Fluorine NMR: Why Not?
AstraZeneca Layoffs and Closings